Economic evaluation of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination programmes in The Netherlands and its impact

R Welte1, G van den Dobbelsteen, J M Bos

  • 1GSF--National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management (IGM), Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. robert.welte@gsf.de

Vaccine
|November 9, 2004
PubMed

Insights

Meningococcal C conjugate vaccination offers significant health gains. A catch-up program and routine vaccination at 14 months are cost-effective, influencing Dutch immunization policy.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Economics
  • Vaccinology

Background:

  • Meningococcal C disease poses a significant public health risk.
  • Evaluating the economic impact of vaccination strategies is crucial for resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the cost-effectiveness of meningococcal C conjugate vaccination strategies in The Netherlands.
  • To compare routine childhood immunization schedules with a catch-up vaccination program.

Main Methods:

  • A decision analysis cohort model with a 77-year time horizon was utilized.
  • Societal and healthcare payer perspectives were adopted, including direct and indirect costs.
  • Future costs and effects were discounted at a 4% rate.

Main Results:

  • All evaluated meningococcal C vaccination strategies resulted in substantial health gains.
  • The catch-up program and routine vaccination at 14 months demonstrated favorable cost-effectiveness ratios.
  • Routine vaccination in the first year of life was significantly less cost-effective compared to 14-month vaccination.

Conclusions:

  • Meningococcal C conjugate vaccination at 14 months and a catch-up program are highly cost-effective interventions.
  • These findings supported the implementation of meningococcal C vaccination in the Dutch routine childhood immunization schedule and a catch-up program in 2002.
  • Herd immunity effects enhance the cost-effectiveness of the catch-up program.

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics01:29

Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics

Microorganisms play a fundamental role in vaccine development, gene therapy, and therapeutic production. Their biological properties are harnessed to advance medicine and public health. Beyond immunization, microorganisms contribute to gut health, antibiotic synthesis, and genetic disease treatment.Live Attenuated and Inactivated VaccinesLive attenuated vaccines, such as the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, utilize weakened forms of pathogens to closely resemble natural infections.
Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

Overview
Vaccine Production01:23

Vaccine Production

Vaccine production involves a sequence of upstream and downstream processes to generate a safe and effective immunological product. It begins with cultivating microorganisms, such as viruses or bacteria, to obtain antigenic material. For viral vaccines, mammalian host cells are grown in bioreactors and subsequently infected with the target virus. The virus replicates within the host cells, which are lysed to release viral particles. This lysate is then clarified through filtration or...