Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Inducing Meningococcal Meningitis Serogroup C in Mice via Intracisternal Delivery
Published on: November 5, 2019
Economic evaluation of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination programmes in The Netherlands and its impact
R Welte1, G van den Dobbelsteen, J M Bos
1GSF--National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management (IGM), Ingolstädter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. robert.welte@gsf.de
Insights
Meningococcal C conjugate vaccination offers significant health gains. A catch-up program and routine vaccination at 14 months are cost-effective, influencing Dutch immunization policy.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Vaccinology
Background:
- Meningococcal C disease poses a significant public health risk.
- Evaluating the economic impact of vaccination strategies is crucial for resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of meningococcal C conjugate vaccination strategies in The Netherlands.
- To compare routine childhood immunization schedules with a catch-up vaccination program.
Main Methods:
- A decision analysis cohort model with a 77-year time horizon was utilized.
- Societal and healthcare payer perspectives were adopted, including direct and indirect costs.
- Future costs and effects were discounted at a 4% rate.
Main Results:
- All evaluated meningococcal C vaccination strategies resulted in substantial health gains.
- The catch-up program and routine vaccination at 14 months demonstrated favorable cost-effectiveness ratios.
- Routine vaccination in the first year of life was significantly less cost-effective compared to 14-month vaccination.
Conclusions:
- Meningococcal C conjugate vaccination at 14 months and a catch-up program are highly cost-effective interventions.
- These findings supported the implementation of meningococcal C vaccination in the Dutch routine childhood immunization schedule and a catch-up program in 2002.
- Herd immunity effects enhance the cost-effectiveness of the catch-up program.
Abstract:
The cost-effectiveness of one time vaccination of all persons aged 14 months to 18 years (catch-up programme) and of routine childhood immunisation at either ages 2 + 3 + 4 months, 5 + 6 months, or 14 months with a meningococcal C conjugate vaccine was estimated for The Netherlands, from a societal and a health care payer perspective. A decision analysis cohort model was employed (time horizon 77 years), direct and indirect costs (friction cost method) were considered and future costs and effects were discounted at 4%. The results showed that all vaccination options yield a substantial health gain and that the catch-up programme and routine vaccination at 14 months render favourable cost-effectiveness ratios: between about 13,200 and 17,700 per life year gained for the catch-up programme and between about 2200 and 2400 per life year gained for routine childhood vaccination at 14 months, depending on the perspective. In comparison to vaccination at 14 months, routine childhood vaccination during the first year of life is much less cost-effective: each additional life year gained costs approximately 147,000 (2 + 3 + 4 months) or 102,000 (5 + 6 months), from both perspectives. Additionally, inclusion of the likely herd immunity effect of the catch-up programme increases these incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. These results played a major role in the decision to add meningococcal C vaccination to the routine childhood immunisation schedule at 14 months and to implement a catch-up vaccination programme in The Netherlands in 2002.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Vaccinations
Vaccine Production

