Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Increasing screening uptake amongst those intending to be screened: the use of action plans
Susan Michie1, Elizabeth Dormandy, Theresa M Marteau
1Department of Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research & Effectiveness, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK. s.michie@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract:
This experimental study investigates an intervention designed to increase rates of antenatal screening uptake in those intending to undergo antenatal screening. Eighty-eight pregnant women intending to undergo prenatal screening were alternately allocated to standard care or asked to write a simple plan for attending or making an appointment. Twenty-five (63%) in the intervention group made an action plan. There was no difference in uptake of screening between the intervention group and the control group, nor between those making an action plan and the control group. Within the intervention group, those making an action plan had higher screening uptake (21/25, 84%) than those not making one (7/15, 47%; CI(95) difference = 8-66%, P = 0.017). Asking women who intend to undergo screening to make an action plan does not increase screening uptake. This result raises doubts about introducing simple action plans in a clinical situation as an effective means of changing behaviour.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Planning Nursing Care I
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
