Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical

Thiagarajan Nambirajan¹, Stephan Jeschke, Hassan Al-Zahrani

¹Department of Urology, Elisabethinen Hospital, Linz, Austria.

|November 10, 2004

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Erratum: Randomized Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transurethral Resection for Staging New Bladder Cancers: Results From the Prospective BladderPath Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025

Same author

Randomized Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transurethral Resection for Staging New Bladder Cancers: Results From the Prospective BladderPath Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025

Same author

Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Ureteral Frozen Section Analysis During Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Cureus·2024

Same author

Corrigendum re "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Males: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study" [Eur Urol 2009;56:418-24].

European urology·2020

Same author

Early sacral neuromodulation ameliorates urinary bladder function and structure in complete spinal cord injury minipigs.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2019

Same author

Standardized and Validated Training Programs for Robot-assisted Laparoscopy: The Challenge of the Future.

European urology·2019

This study found no significant differences in patient outcomes or surgical difficulty between transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy (RRN) for early-stage kidney cancer.

Area of Science:

Urology
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Surgical Oncology

Background:

Radical nephrectomy is a standard treatment for kidney cancer.
Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches are common for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN).
Comparative data on patient morbidity and technical difficulty between these approaches are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

To prospectively compare transperitoneal LRN and retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy (RRN).
To evaluate differences in patient morbidity and surgeon technical difficulty.

Main Methods:

A prospective randomized study of 40 patients with cT1-T2 kidney tumors.
Patients were randomized to either LRN or RRN.
Outcomes and technical difficulty (European scoring system) were assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

No significant differences in operative time, blood loss, complications, or hospital stay between LRN and RRN.
Complete tumor excision was achieved with both approaches.
Slightly delayed oral intake in the RRN group and increased difficulty with robotic assistance in RRN were noted, but not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Transperitoneal LRN and RRN demonstrate comparable patient morbidity and technical difficulty.
Both approaches are effective for radical nephrectomy in early-stage kidney cancer.
Further research may explore nuances in robotic assistance and specific patient factors.