Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
Published on: June 16, 2018
Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale
Robin S Turpin1, Ronald J Ozminkowski, Claire E Sharda
1USHH Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania 19486-0004, USA. robin_turpin@merck.com
Objective:
This study reports the reliability and validity of the 13-item Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS). The SPS differs from similar scales by focusing on knowledge-based and production-based workers.
Methods:
Data were obtained from administrative and medical claims databases and from a survey that incorporated the SPS, SF-36, and the Work Limitations Questionnaire.
Results:
Sixty-three percent (7797) of employees responded. Cronbach's alpha (0.83) indicates adequate reliability. Factor analysis identified two underlying factors, "completing work" and "avoiding distraction." Knowledge-based workers load on "completing work" (alpha = 0.97), whereas production-based workers load on "avoiding distraction" (alpha = 0.98). There were significant and positive relationships between the SPS, SF-36, and Work Limitations Questionnaire.
Conclusions:
The SPS demonstrates a high degree of reliability and validity and may be ideal for employers who seek a single scale to measure health-related productivity in a diverse employee population.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
