Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Implantation of Combined Telemetric ECG and Blood Pressure Transmitters to Determine Spontaneous Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Mice
Published on: February 14, 2021
Errors and misconceptions in ECG measurement used for the detection of drug induced QT interval prolongation
1Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, England, UK. m.malik@sghms.ac.uk
Abstract:
Drug-induced changes in cardiac repolarisation receive substantial attention by regulatory agencies. Since there are presently no established accurate possibilities of testing the propensity to torsade induction during clinical drug development, the regulators require drug-related QT interval changes to be thoroughly investigated with almost all new pharmacological agents. Small QT interval changes are easy to miss and the regulators therefore expect the relevant studies to be very precise. Such a precision is not easy to achieve and different strategies have been proposed. The purpose of this article is to review the most frequent misconceptions and errors in the electrocardiogram handling and measurements related to the detection to drug-induced QT interval changes. Specifically, the article discusses (a) the possibilities of automatic measurement by standard electrocardiographic equipment, (b) the danger of casual measurement by central laboratories handling the electrocardiograms, (c) the selection of recording leads for QT interval measurement, and (d) the problem of the so-called heart rate hysteresis of the QT interval adaptation. Suggestions are made for drug developers of what study design and quality control aspects are needed to avoid the most frequent imprecisions.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Interval Level of Measurement
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Fundamental Attribution Error

