Related Experiment Videos
Case-sibling gene-association studies for diseases with variable age at onset
1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. pkraft@hsph.harvard.edu
Statistics in Medicine
|November 10, 2004
Summary
Family-based genetic studies analyzing complex diseases benefit from methods accounting for variable age at onset. The retrospective likelihood method offers improved efficiency and accurate risk estimates, especially for rare diseases, compared to traditional approaches.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Biostatistics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Family-based genetic studies are crucial for identifying associations between genetic loci and phenotypic traits.
- Traditional binary disease models used in family studies can be inefficient or biased for complex diseases with variable age at onset.
- Population stratification is a key confounder that family-based studies help to mitigate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and assess analytical methods for censored age-at-onset data in family studies.
- To compare the performance of stratified Cox regression, genotype-decomposition regression, and a novel retrospective likelihood method.
- To provide guidance on appropriate methods based on disease prevalence and analytic goals.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing methods: stratified Cox regression and genotype-decomposition regression.
- Introduction of a new retrospective likelihood method for censored age-at-onset data.
- Performance assessment via simulation studies, evaluating type I error rates and confidence interval coverage.
Main Results:
- Stratified Cox regression and the retrospective likelihood method demonstrated appropriate type I error rates.
- Genotype-decomposition regression was often anti-conservative.
- Stratified Cox regression confidence intervals were anti-conservative for rare diseases; the retrospective likelihood showed better efficiency and coverage, particularly for rare diseases.
Conclusions:
- Stratified Cox regression is suitable for common diseases when estimating genotype relative risks.
- The retrospective likelihood method is more appropriate for rare diseases due to its efficiency and accurate confidence interval coverage.
- The choice of method depends on disease rarity and the primary analytical objective in family-based genetic studies.