Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Ethics of randomised controlled trials--not yet time to give up on equipoise
1Medical Ethics Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK. r.ashcroft@imperial.ac.uk
Abstract:
In this commentary on Fries and Krishnan's argument that 'design bias' undermines the status of equipoise as the ethical justification for randomised controlled trials, it is argued that their argument is analogous to Bayesian arguments for the use of informative priors in trial design, but that this does not undermine the importance of equipoise. In particular, mismatches between the outcomes of interest to industrial sponsors of research and outcomes of interest to patients and clinicians ensure that in many cases industry-sponsored trials can fail to reflect the reasonable equipoise of working clinicians.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Blinding
Ethics in Research
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs