Related Experiment Videos
Bracketing in research: a typology
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Qualitative Health Research
|November 13, 2004
Summary
Bracketing in qualitative research is often vague. This study clarifies its core elements and proposes six distinct forms to enhance methodological rigor and understanding in scientific studies.
Area of Science:
- Qualitative Research Methodology
- Phenomenological Research
- Scientific Inquiry
Background:
- The term "bracketing" is widely used in qualitative research but lacks clear operationalization.
- Its application in studies has become superficial, detached from its phenomenological origins.
- This disconnect reduces bracketing to an ill-defined technique or a "black-box" term.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of bracketing.
- To identify and delineate the core elements that constitute bracketing.
- To distinguish how different research approaches prioritize these elements.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of bracketing in qualitative research.
- Examination of its origins in phenomenology.
- Development of a typology of bracketing forms.
Main Results:
- Bracketing's application in qualitative research is often vague and superficial.
- A typology of six distinct forms of bracketing has been developed.
- The typology clarifies the methodological rigor and evolution of bracketing.
Conclusions:
- Clarifying bracketing's core elements enhances its methodological rigor.
- Understanding distinct forms of bracketing improves its application in qualitative research.
- This work provides a framework for a more precise and effective use of bracketing.