Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advance care planning.

Bernard Lo1

  • 1The Program in Medical Ethics, the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, USA. bernie@medicine.ucsf.edu

The American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
|November 13, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Framework for Assessing the Permissibility of Academic Leaders' Outside Activities.

The Milbank quarterly·2025
Same author

Functional targeting of ILC2s and ILC3s reveals selective roles in intestinal fibrosis and homeostasis.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2025
Same author

Does It Matter That Surveyed Bioethicists Are Not Similar to Patients in Clinical Ethics Consultations.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same author

Clinicians' Use of Choice Framing in ICU Family Meetings.

Critical care medicine·2024
Same author

Fundamentals of Medical Ethics - A New Perspective Series.

The New England journal of medicine·2023
Same author

Deciding for Patients Who Have Lost Decision-Making Capacity - Finding Common Ground in Medical Ethics.

The New England journal of medicine·2023
Same journal

Systolic anterior motion of a retained anterior mitral valve leaflet following mitral valve replacement.

The American journal of geriatric cardiology·2008
Same journal

Biomarkers, age, and coronary artery remodeling in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

The American journal of geriatric cardiology·2008
Same journal

Electrocardiographic intervals in the healthy geriatric population--what are the "normals"?

The American journal of geriatric cardiology·2008
Same journal

Coronary events in persons aged 75 years or older in Finland from 1995 to 2002: the FINAMI study.

The American journal of geriatric cardiology·2008
Same journal

Sinus venosus atrial septal defect diagnosed at age 82.

The American journal of geriatric cardiology·2008
Same journal

Frailty, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease: evidence of a connection.

The American journal of geriatric cardiology·2008
See all related articles

Advance directives empower patients in decision-making. Physicians can enhance these discussions by clarifying patient values and appointing a healthcare proxy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Bioethics
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Advance directives (ADs) permit patients to retain control over medical decisions when incapacitated.
  • Written ADs are legally recognized but face procedural hurdles; oral ADs are common yet restricted.
  • ADs have limitations including infrequent use, potential lack of informed consent, and conflicts with patient best interests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the limitations of advance directives and physician-patient discussions.
  • To identify strategies for improving the effectiveness of advance directives.

Main Methods:

  • Review of state laws governing advance directives.
  • Analysis of factors limiting the efficacy of advance directives.
  • Examination of physician-patient communication regarding advance directives.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Advance directives are underutilized and may not accurately reflect patient wishes.
  • Surrogate decision-makers often struggle to recall patient preferences accurately.
  • Physician-patient discussions about advance directives are frequently inadequate.

Conclusions:

  • Improving advance directive utilization requires addressing limitations in their use and communication.
  • Physicians should prioritize identifying patient values and appointing healthcare proxies.
  • Enhanced communication strategies can improve the informed use of advance directives.