Related Experiment Videos
Bladder neck stenosis after transurethral resection of prostate: does size matter?
W Al-Singary1, M Arya, H R H Patel
1Department of Urology, Worthing Hospital NHS Trust, Worthing, UK.
Aim:
To understand the risk factors associated with the incidence of bladder neck stenosis (BNS) after transurethral prostate surgery.
Patients And Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 900 patients who underwent transurethral prostate surgery over a 4-year period. The mean age of the men was 72.3 (47-94) years. The specific outcome data assessed related to BNS, including type of operation performed, resected tissue weight and history of previous surgery in the lower urinary tract.
Results:
29 (3.4%) patients developed BNS at a mean of 10.3 (3-33) months, with a mean resected prostatic tissue weight of 11+/-3.7 g. Four of the 29 patients with BNS were treated with bladder neck resection and re-stenosed. Fifty-four men underwent bladder neck incision for small prostates with a high bladder neck, measured by digital rectal examination and assessed cystoscopically, with no BNS. All the remaining patients from our series did not have a BNS, with a mean resected weight of 28+/-8.9 g, which is statistically greater than in the BNS group (p<0.05, unpaired t test).
Conclusions:
BNS after transurethral prostate surgery is a significant problem. It is clear from our study that resection in small prostates with no sign of a high bladder neck will increase the development of BNS. Thus, small prostates should be managed by an initial bladder neck incision, even if the bladder neck is not high.