Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026
Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Alpha-adrenergic receptor blockade and hyperaemic response in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses
Emanuele Barbato1, Jozef Bartunek, Wilbert Aarnoudse
1Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Onze Lieve Vrouw Clinic, Moorselbaan 164, B-9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Background:
Maximal hyperaemia is paramount in the diagnosis of patients with coronary artery disease. However in these patients, enhanced alpha-adrenergic microvascular vasoconstriction may preclude adenosine to induce maximal hyperaemia.
Aim:
To assess the presence and the clinical relevance of residual microvascular resistance after administration of adenosine.
Methods And Results:
Fractional flow reserve (FFR, calculated by coronary pressure measurements during adenosine-induced hyperaemia) was assessed in 85 patients with an intermediate coronary stenosis (mean diameter stenosis of 50+/-1%) and normal left ventricular function which were divided into the following three groups: (a) 33 patients before and after IC bolus of phentolamine, an alpha1-, alpha2-adrenergic blocker; (b) 32 patients before and after IC bolus of urapidil, a selective alpha1-adrenergic blocker; (c) 20 patients before and after IC bolus of saline. Since minimal luminal diameter remained unchanged before and after phentolamine (1.46+/-0.06 vs. 1.47+/-0.06 mm, ns), urapidil (1.46+/-0.06 vs. 1.39+/-0.08, ns), and saline (1.56+/-0.08 vs. 1.55+/-0.08, ns), changes in FFR reflects changes in microvascular resistance. Overall, phentolamine and urapidil induced a slight but significant decrease in FFR (phentolamine: 0.79+/-0.02 vs. 0.77+/-0.02, p<0.05; urapidil: 0.78+/-0.02 vs. 0.75+/-0.02, p<0.05). However, only 6 patients showed a change in FFR from > or = 0.75 to <0.75 and no patients showed a change in FFR from > or = 0.80 to <0.75 that could have influenced clinical decision making. Saline did not induce any change in FFR. Phentolamine and urapidil induced only transient and negligible haemodynamic changes in heart rate and blood pressure.
Conclusions:
The administration of alpha-adrenergic blockers in addition to adenosine unmasks a small, yet clinically irrelevant, degree of residual microvascular tone. The consequential changes in FFR values do not significantly affect clinical decision making.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
α1-blockers: These drugs inhibit α1-adrenoceptors on smooth muscle cells, resulting in vasodilation. This vasodilation lowers blood pressure, making α1-blockers valuable in treating hypertension. Additionally, α1-blockers effectively address urinary obstruction...
01:31Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
01:16Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
01:27Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
01:17Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline moieties. Phenoxybenzamine, with a haloalkylamine...
01:26Adrenergic Receptors: β Subtype
Isoprenaline > Adrenaline > Noradrenaline
Neurotransmitter binding to these receptors causes activation of adenylyl cyclase resulting in increased concentrations of cAMP and modulation of calcium ion channels within the cell. They are further classified into β1, β2, and β3 subtypes.
β1-adrenoceptors: β1-adrenoceptors have equal affinities for...