Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites.

Valeria V Gordan1, Chiayi Shen, Ivar A Mjor

  • 1Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, USA.

General Dentistry
|November 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Associations of types of pain with crack-level, tooth-level and patient-level characteristics in posterior teeth with visible cracks: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network" [Journal of Dentistry 2018 Mar;70:67-73].

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Comparison of Self-Reported Evidence-Practice Gap Improvement Strategies Among Japanese and Brazilian Dentists.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

Comparison of factors associated with the evidence-practice gap as perceived by Japanese and Brazilian dentists.

Journal of dentistry·2024
Same author

Recruitment strategies and retention rates for five National Dental PBRN studies.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2024
Same author

Survival analysis of posterior composite restorations in National Dental PBRN general dentistry practices.

Journal of dentistry·2024
Same author

Constructing the brief diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (bDC/TMD) for field testing.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2023
Same journal

Calcified antral mass and Circumscribed periapical radiolucency.

General dentistry·2026
Same journal

Influence of the thickness of high-translucency ceramics on the bond strength of a universal resin cement following different storage times.

General dentistry·2026
Same journal

Effect of immediate vs delayed polishing on the surface roughness of microhybrid and nanohybrid composite resins.

General dentistry·2026
Same journal

Application of orthodontic elastics for the treatment of midline diastemas.

General dentistry·2026
Same journal

Guided eruption of an impacted maxillary right canine: a multidisciplinary case report.

General dentistry·2026
Same journal

Giant compound odontoma associated with a severely displaced mandibular canine: a case report.

General dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Repairing resin composites with flowable composites results in the weakest bond strength at the flowable/dentin interface. This interface also shows the highest failure rates, indicating a critical area for dental material research.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Restorative Dentistry

Background:

  • Dental composite restorations are susceptible to degradation and fracture.
  • Flowable composites are often used for repairing resin-based composites.
  • The bond integrity at the interface between restorative materials and tooth structure is crucial for longevity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the bond strength and failure frequency at the interface when repairing resin composites with flowable composites.
  • To compare the bond strength of different interfaces: flowable/dentin, hybrid composite/flowable, and within dentin and flowable resin.
  • To investigate the influence of dentin location (pulp chamber vs. dentino-enamel junction) on bond strength.

Main Methods:

  • The study compared three groups: dentin, flowable composite, and hybrid composite.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to analyze mean bond strength values.
  • Bond strength was assessed at various interfaces, including flowable/dentin and hybrid/flowable.

    • Main Results:

    • The flowable/dentin interface exhibited significantly lower mean bond strength compared to the hybrid/flowable interface and within the flowable resin.
    • Bond strength within dentin was also significantly lower than at the hybrid/flowable interface and within the flowable resin.
    • Dentin closer to the pulp chamber demonstrated lower bond strength than dentin at the dentino-enamel junction.
    • The flowable resin/dentin interface showed the weakest bond and the highest frequency of failure.

    Conclusions:

    • The interface between flowable composite and dentin represents the weakest link when repairing resin composites.
    • Higher failure rates at the flowable/dentin interface highlight the need for improved bonding strategies in dental repair.
    • Dentin location significantly impacts bond strength, with pulp-adjacent dentin being more vulnerable.