Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interface radiation dosimetry in mandibular reconstruction.

H C Schwartz, M Wollin, D L Leake

    Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
    |May 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Report of a rare testicular teratoid Wilms Tumor in an adult patient.

    Urology case reports·2021
    Same author

    The acute effect of match play on hamstring strength and lower limb flexibility in elite youth football players.

    Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2016
    Same author

    Does computer-aided surgical simulation improve efficiency in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery?

    International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2013
    Same author

    Human cytomegalovirus infection leads to elevated levels of transplant arteriosclerosis in a humanized mouse aortic xenograft model.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2012
    Same author

    Dental anesthesia training: the harbor general hospital program.

    Anesthesia progress·2009
    Same author

    The role of radiation therapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia kidney infiltration.

    Medical and pediatric oncology·2001
    Same journal

    Lidocaine in the treatment of Meniere's disease.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Irradiation after neck dissection.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Forehead lift.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Laryngeal cyst of the thyroid cartilage.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Metabolic facial paralysis in an infant.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    Same journal

    Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on stapedectomy prostheses.

    Archives of otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·1985
    See all related articles

    Metallic trays used in mandibular reconstruction significantly increase radiation dose, potentially harming surrounding tissues. Using nonmetallic trays helps maintain dose homogeneity during radiation therapy, avoiding excessive irradiation and soft-tissue reactions.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomaterials Science
    • Radiation Oncology
    • Medical Physics

    Background:

    • Radiation therapy can cause dose enhancement at interfaces between different materials.
    • Mandibular reconstruction often involves implantable trays, creating such interfaces.
    • Understanding dose distribution is crucial for patient safety during radiation treatment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of different mandibular tray materials on radiation absorbed dose.
    • To determine if metallic or nonmetallic trays affect dose homogeneity in surrounding tissues.
    • To provide recommendations for material selection in mandibular reconstruction prior to radiation therapy.

    Main Methods:

    • Radiation dose measurements were performed in tissue-equivalent material surrounding implants.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Four tray materials were tested: titanium, vitallium, stainless steel (metallic), and Dacron/polyetherurethane (nonmetallic).
  • Absorbed dose was quantified adjacent to each implant type.
  • Main Results:

    • Metallic trays (titanium, vitallium, stainless steel) showed a significant absorbed dose enhancement of 29% to 36%.
    • The nonmetallic Dacron/polyetherurethane tray exhibited only a 1% dose enhancement.
    • Dose enhancement was directly related to the atomic number difference at the material interface.

    Conclusions:

    • Metallic implants in mandibular reconstruction can lead to substantial, localized increases in radiation dose.
    • Nonmetallic trays minimize radiation dose enhancement, preserving dose homogeneity.
    • Selecting nonmetallic materials for mandibular trays is recommended to avoid excessive irradiation and potential soft-tissue complications during radiation therapy.