Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The acromioclavicular joint.

Phyllis Montellese1, Timothy Dancy

  • 1Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and Primary Care Sports Medicine Fellowship, UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, School of Nursing Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA. montellesepb@upmc.edu

Primary Care
|November 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intravenous nesiritide in acute heart failure.

American journal of therapeuticsยท2005
See all related articles

Primary care physicians can effectively manage acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries by distinguishing between types I-III and IV-VI. Conservative treatment is recommended for types I-III, while types IV-VI require surgical referral.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Sports Medicine
  • Musculoskeletal Injury

Background:

  • Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are common in the shoulder.
  • Diagnosis can be challenging due to associated injuries.
  • Effective management relies on accurate classification and timely intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline diagnostic and management strategies for AC joint injuries.
  • To differentiate between injuries requiring conservative versus surgical treatment.
  • To empower primary care physicians in managing AC joint conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Clinical examination and radiographic assessment for diagnosis.
  • Classification of AC joint injuries into types I-VI.
  • Conservative management protocols for lower-grade injuries.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Referral guidelines for higher-grade injuries.

    • Main Results:

    • A thorough examination and radiographs are key to diagnosing AC joint injuries.
    • Types I, II, and III AC separations are effectively managed with pain control and rehabilitation.
    • Types IV, V, and VI AC separations necessitate referral to an orthopedic surgeon.
    • Steroid injections can aid in diagnosing and managing chronic AC joint conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Primary care physicians can effectively manage most AC joint injuries.
    • Accurate classification of AC joint injuries is crucial for appropriate treatment.
    • Conservative management is the mainstay for lower-grade AC joint injuries.
    • Surgical referral is indicated for severe AC joint injuries (types IV-VI).