Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Direct comparison of a contractility and activity pacemaker sensor during treadmill exercise testing.

Ayten Erol-Yilmaz1, Raymond Tukkie, Job De Boo

  • 1Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Hospital Goes Amsterdam, the Netherlands. a.yilmaz@amc.uva.nl

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|November 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prominent T-wave induced by Valsalva maneuver associated with a RYR2 loss-of-function variant.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Elite-Level Sports: A 12-Year Follow-Up Case.

JACC. Case reports·2026
Same author

Subcutaneous Defibrillator Implantation With or Without Defibrillation Test: The Primary Results of the Randomized PRAETORIAN-DFT Trial.

Circulation·2026
Same author

Leveraging the shared and opposing genetic mechanisms in the heritable cardiomyopathies.

Research square·2026
Same author

Prognostic Role of Myocarditis-Like Episodes and Their Treatment in Patients With Pathogenic Desmoplakin Variants.

Circulation·2025
Same author

Cardiac troponin for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Resuscitation·2025

The peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) sensor shows limited chronotropic capacity during exercise. Combining PEA with an activity (ACT) sensor in a dual system is recommended for better pacemaker function.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Limited data exists on the chronotropic capacity of the peak endocardial acceleration (PEA) sensor.
  • Pacemaker chronotropic incompetence affects exercise capacity.
  • Understanding sensor function is crucial for optimizing pacemaker performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare the chronotropic function of the PEA sensor versus the activity (ACT) sensor.
  • To evaluate the performance of a single PEA sensor system during exercise.
  • To determine optimal sensor configurations for pacemaker patients.

Main Methods:

  • 18 pacemaker patients (VVIR mode) and 11 healthy controls underwent a chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP).
  • PEA and ACT sensors were programmed and tested, with ACT externally strapped to the thorax.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Heart rate (HR) response, time to peak HR, and recovery HR were measured.

    • Main Results:

    • Pacemaker patients had significantly shorter exercise duration (9.2 min) compared to controls (18.4 min).
    • Maximal HR achieved was lower with PEA (124 bpm) and ACT (140 bpm) compared to controls (153 bpm).
    • The PEA sensor demonstrated hypochonotropic function as a single sensor system.

    Conclusions:

    • The PEA sensor alone exhibits limited chronotropic response during exercise.
    • Combining PEA with an activity-based sensor in a dual system is preferable for improved pacemaker function.
    • Pacemaker patients exhibit reduced exercise capacity despite normal left ventricular function.