Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery.

Adam Atherly1, Aaron S Fink, Darrell C Campbell

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. N.E., Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. aather1@sph.emory.edu

American Journal of Surgery
|November 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual, community, and structural determinants of diagnostic testing decisions during public health crises: evidence from dynamic access and behavioural trade-offs.

BMJ public health·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of the Support and Services at Home (SASH) Program for Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Community-Based Approach to Healthy Aging in Place.

Health services research·2026
Same author

Incremental Cost and Length of Stay Associated With Complications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

JACC. Advances·2025
Same author

Hospital health information exchange participation and heart failure discharges to skilled nursing facilities: a cohort study.

BMC health services research·2025
Same author

Financial resilience of rural hospitals: Prepandemic vulnerabilities and Provider Relief Funds' role during COVID-19.

The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association·2025
Same author

Understanding the Effect of Race on Medicare Advantage Enrollment.

Health services research·2025

Different risk-adjustment methods significantly impact surgical quality comparisons. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) best predicted mortality, unlike DxCG and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Surgical Quality Improvement
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Comparing institutional healthcare outcomes necessitates risk adjustment.
  • Risk-adjustment methodologies can influence comparative results.
  • Accurate risk adjustment is crucial for evaluating surgical care quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare three distinct risk-adjustment methodologies for assessing surgical care quality.
  • To evaluate the agreement and predictive accuracy of different risk-adjustment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Compared National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), DxCG, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) risk adjustors.
  • Utilized data from 2,167 surgical patients across three academic institutions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed risk scores against each other and mortality outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant disagreement observed in risk assessments across the three methodologies.
    • Weak association between Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and DxCG; poor correlation with NSQIP.
    • NSQIP demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting mortality, followed by DxCG and CCI.

    Conclusions:

    • Different risk-adjustment methodologies yield varying estimates of mortality risk in surgical patients.
    • Methodology choice critically affects the interpretation of surgical quality data.
    • NSQIP shows superior performance in predicting mortality compared to ICD-9 based methods.