Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia: identification and impact
1Endocrinology and Diabetes Service, Hospital Clínic Universitari, IDIBAPS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. gomis@medicina.ub.es
Abstract:
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated that intensive management in people with type 1 diabetes delays the onset and the progression of microvascular complications associated with the disease. However, it is also known that intensive regimens can increase the number of hypoglycaemias and that the perception of symptoms decreases in relation to the statutes of metabolic control 1. Impairment of hypoglycaemic awareness is reported by up to 50% of patients with type 1 diabetes and it is associated with an increase of severe episodes of hypoglycaemia 2. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has become a major tool in the management of diabetes. Current recommendations suggest frequent SMBG. The major inconvenience of SMBG is due to the limitations of the glycaemic profile obtained from intermittent finger-sticks. This is an incomplete picture of blood glucose excursions; moreover, the frequent SMBG is not readily accepted by patients suffering from diabetes because it is invasive and painful.
Insights
Intensive diabetes management can cause hypoglycemia, impairing awareness. Frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is recommended but is invasive and provides an incomplete picture of glucose levels.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Intensive diabetes management, proven effective by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), delays microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes.
- Intensive regimens are associated with increased hypoglycemia, and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia symptoms is reported in up to 50% of type 1 diabetes patients.
- Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is crucial for diabetes management, but current methods have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the limitations of intermittent finger-stick blood glucose monitoring.
- To explore alternative methods for assessing glycemic control in type 1 diabetes.
- To improve patient acceptance and adherence to monitoring protocols.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on diabetes management and monitoring techniques.
- Analysis of the challenges associated with frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).
- Discussion of the impact of impaired hypoglycemic awareness on diabetes control.
Main Results:
- Intensive diabetes management effectively reduces microvascular complications.
- Hypoglycemia and impaired awareness of its symptoms are significant challenges in intensive diabetes therapy.
- Current SMBG methods are invasive, painful, and provide an incomplete glycemic profile.
Conclusions:
- There is a need for improved methods for monitoring blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes.
- Enhanced monitoring strategies could mitigate risks associated with intensive management and improve patient outcomes.
- Addressing the limitations of SMBG is essential for better diabetes self-care and reduced complication rates.
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia
Hyperglycemia
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Type I Diabetes III: Clinical Manifestations