Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A methodology for testing for statistically significant differences between fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms.

S S Furuie1, G T Herman, T K Narayan

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, Fourth Floor, 418 Service Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021, USA.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LUFT: A low-frequency ultrasound tomography system designed for lung imaging.

IEEE sensors journal·2024
Same author

Joint EANM/SNMMI guideline on radiomics in nuclear medicine : Jointly supported by the EANM Physics Committee and the SNMMI Physics, Instrumentation and Data Sciences Council.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2022
Same author

Characterization or Monolithic Scintillation Detectors Etched with Laser Induced Optical Barriers.

IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences·2021
Same author

Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets.

Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)·2020
Same author

Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2018
Same author

Impact of event positioning algorithm on performance of a whole-body PET scanner using one-to-one coupled detectors.

Physics in medicine and biology·2018
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Measured and Monte Carlo simulated electron backscatter to the monitor chamber for the varian TrueBeam linac (2016<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>61</b>8779).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: 3D range-modulator for scanned particle therapy: development, Monte Carlo simulations and experimental evaluation (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>7075).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Recent progress in applications of computing to radiotherapy (ICCR 2016).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Novel TMS coils designed using an inverse boundary element method.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a practical method for assessing 3D Positron Emission Tomography (PET) reconstruction techniques. The methodology ensures reliable evaluation of 3D PET imaging performance for medical applications.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Image Reconstruction
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • 3D Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is crucial for medical diagnosis.
  • Evaluating the performance of 3D PET reconstruction algorithms is complex.
  • Standardized methodologies are needed for reliable algorithm comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a practical methodology for evaluating 3D PET reconstruction methods.
  • To establish a framework for comparing the performance of different 3D PET reconstruction algorithms.
  • To ensure the validity and applicability of the evaluation for clinical use.

Main Methods:

  • Generation of statistically representative 3D image datasets.
  • Simulation of realistic 3D PET projection data, including noise and detector effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Definition of application-specific figures of merit for quantitative assessment.
  • Optimization of reconstruction algorithms using training data.
  • Statistical hypothesis testing for algorithm performance comparison.

    • Main Results:

    • A comprehensive methodology for 3D PET reconstruction evaluation was successfully developed.
    • The methodology allows for rigorous comparison of reconstruction algorithms.
    • The framework is adaptable for other 3D imaging modalities like CT and SPECT.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented methodology provides a robust approach for evaluating 3D PET reconstruction.
    • This standardized evaluation ensures the reliability of PET imaging in medical applications.
    • The adaptable framework supports advancements in various 3D imaging techniques.