Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some pitfalls in measuring memory in animals.

Christina M Thorpe1, Claudia Jacova, Donald M Wilkie

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Kenny Building, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4. cmthorpe@interchange.ubc.ca

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
|November 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Manifestations.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Clinical Manifestations.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Evidence that ovarian hormones, but not diet and exercise, contribute to the sex disparity in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Journal of psychiatric research·2023
Same author

Reshaping the path of mild cognitive impairment by refining exercise prescription: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to understand the "what," "for whom," and "how" of exercise to promote cognitive function.

Trials·2022
Same author

A Systematic Review of Subjective Cognitive Characteristics Predictive of Longitudinal Outcomes in Older Adults.

The Gerontologist·2022
Same author

Unpredictable mealtimes rather than social jetlag affects acquisition and retention of hippocampal dependent memory.

Behavioural processes·2022
Same journal

Dissecting first-episode psychosis heterogeneity with clustering analyses: a systematic review.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Irisin and anxiety-like behaviors: Mechanistic integration of peripheral-central crosstalk, neuroinflammation and neural plasticity.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Rhythms of interaction - the timescales of social coordination and why they matter.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Neural Bases of Memory Development: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Regional heterogeneity of brain insulin resistance: From molecular pathways to neural circuits.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
See all related articles

Scientists must be cautious when studying animal memory due to indirect measurement methods. Pitfalls include silent associations, species-typical behaviors, and flawed human-animal task comparisons, impacting memory research accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Animal Behavior
  • Comparative Psychology

Background:

  • Memory in the brain is not directly observable, necessitating indirect measurement and inferential reasoning.
  • Human memory is typically accessed via language, while animal memory relies on observable behaviors like maze navigation or lever pressing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify potential pitfalls in scientific reasoning about animal memory.
  • To highlight areas requiring caution when interpreting animal memory data.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of common methodologies used in animal memory research.
  • Identification of inferential challenges arising from indirect measurement of memory.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three key areas of potential error in animal memory research were identified: 'silent associations', intrusions of species-typical behaviors, and improper mapping of human to animal tasks.
  • These factors can lead to inaccuracies in statements about the status of animal memories.

    • Conclusions:

    • Researchers must exercise caution when interpreting animal memory data due to inherent limitations in measurement.
    • Addressing these identified pitfalls is crucial for advancing the accuracy and reliability of animal memory research.