Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHC)
Published on: May 10, 2016
WHO health risk assessment process for static fields
T E van Deventer1, R Saunders, M H Repacholi
1Radiation and Environmental Health Unit, Protection of the Human Environment, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, 21, CH 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing guidelines for safe exposure to static electric and magnetic fields (EMFs). A weight-of-evidence approach and a precautionary framework address scientific uncertainties for health risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Public Health
- Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Research
Background:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to ensure healthy environments, including advising on the health impacts of electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
- Static electric and magnetic fields are a focus of the WHO's International EMF Project, aiming for comprehensive health risk assessment.
- Existing research on static fields necessitates a structured approach to evaluate potential health risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the process for developing the WHO's Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) monograph on static fields.
- To detail the criteria used for selecting studies and the weight-of-evidence approach for health risk assessment.
- To address scientific uncertainty and inform policy through a precautionary framework.
Main Methods:
- Overview of the WHO static fields EHC monograph development process.
- Application of specific criteria for study inclusion in the health risk assessment.
- Utilizing a weight-of-evidence methodology for evaluating scientific data.
Main Results:
- The workshop results contribute to the ongoing WHO health risk assessment of static electric and magnetic fields.
- A comprehensive EHC monograph is planned for publication in early 2005.
- A research agenda and a precautionary framework are being developed to manage uncertainties.
Conclusions:
- The WHO is committed to providing evidence-based guidance on EMF exposure.
- A structured, weight-of-evidence approach is crucial for assessing health risks from static fields.
- Addressing scientific uncertainty through research and precautionary measures is essential for public health protection.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and key...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...

