Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Validity of test score interpretations for three self-concept measures based on differing theoretical models
Richard B Fletcher1, Dru Marshall, Brian Nielsen
1School of Psychology, Massey University Albany, North Shore Mail Centre, Aotearoa, New Zealand. R.B.Fletcher@massey.ac.nz
Abstract:
Three theoretical models have been proposed to represent self-concept: (a) unidimensional; (b) multidimensional; (c) multidimensional hierarchical. Inventories have been developed under each of the three competing theoretical models; which model best represents self-concept is unclear. Typically, self-concept construct validation has utilized various approaches including correlational, multitrait-multimethod, and factor analytic methods. Another method, however, for assessing validity would be to determine the consequences of score interpretations using different measures specific to each of the theoretical models. This paper examined Messick's notion (1989) of the validity of test-score interpretations as applied to three of the most widely used measures derived under each of the three different theoretical models of self-concept. Results suggest that overall multidimensional measures are more consistent in classifying individual's self-concept than unidimensional measures.
Related Concept Videos
Trait and State Self-Esteem
Self-Concept
Infancy and Emerging Recognition
During infancy, self-concept is virtually nonexistent. Babies do not distinguish themselves as separate entities and often mistake their...
Understanding Self-Concept
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
