Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pragmatic clinical trials.

Hugh Macpherson1

  • 1Foundation for Traditional Chinese Medicine, York, UK. hm18@york.ac.uk

Complementary Therapies in Medicine
|November 25, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pragmatic trials evaluate healthcare interventions in real-world settings, offering valuable insights into treatment effectiveness. This article details their methodology, strengths, and limitations for diverse medical evaluations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acupuncture for fatigue in breast cancer survivors: a study protocol for a pragmatic, mixed method, randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2024
Same author

Direct and mediated effects of treatment context on low back pain outcome: a prospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2021
Same author

The Challenges of Evaluating Specific and Nonspecific Effects in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain.

Medical acupuncture·2020
Same author

Do the effects of acupuncture vary between acupuncturists? Analysis of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration individual patient data meta-analysis.

Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society·2020
Same author

Identifying patients with chronic pain who respond to acupuncture: results from an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society·2020
Same author

Why Acupuncture Is More Than Just Needling, and the Implications for Research.

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2019

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials are crucial for evaluating healthcare interventions.
  • Both pragmatic and explanatory trial designs serve distinct, valuable roles.
  • Understanding trial design nuances is essential for accurate interpretation of results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the key steps involved in conducting a pragmatic trial.
  • To discuss the inherent strengths and limitations of pragmatic trial designs.
  • To advocate for the appropriate application of pragmatic trials in evaluating complementary and alternative medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive article outlining the methodology of pragmatic randomized controlled trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of pragmatic trials with explanatory trials, acknowledging hybrid designs.
  • Focus on evaluating interventions within the context of normal clinical practice.

    • Main Results:

    • Pragmatic trials excel at assessing therapy effectiveness as implemented in routine care.
    • Key steps for conducting pragmatic trials are systematically described.
    • Strengths include real-world applicability; limitations relate to controlling variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Pragmatic trials are highly relevant for evaluating healthcare interventions, particularly in naturalistic settings.
    • The design allows for assessment of treatments under typical conditions, enhancing generalizability.
    • Pragmatic trials are well-suited for evaluating alternative and complementary medicine due to their real-world focus.