Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in laparoscopic surgery.

¹Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine and Louisville Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. gaariii@bellsouth.net

Journal of Surgical Oncology

|November 25, 2004

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Synopsis of the 2020 U.S. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Adult Overweight and Obesity.

Military medicine·2021

Same author

Call to duty revisited.

Lancet (London, England)·2016

Same author

Occupational hand infections.

Clinics in occupational and environmental medicine·2006

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Laparoscopic surgery, a minimal access approach, offers benefits like less pain and shorter hospital stays. However, its popularity has led to increased litigation concerning potential surgical errors.

Area of Science:

Minimally Invasive Surgery
Surgical Innovation
Medical Malpractice

Background:

Laparoscopic surgery represents a significant advancement in surgical procedures over the last 15 years.
This minimal access technique has been widely adopted for numerous common operations.
Benefits include reduced post-operative pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker return to work.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a historical overview of laparoscopic surgery's evolution.
To discuss general and specific potential errors associated with common laparoscopic procedures.
To address the rise in litigation related to laparoscopic surgery.

Main Methods:

Historical review of laparoscopic surgery development.
Analysis of common laparoscopic operations.

Related Experiment Videos

Identification and categorization of potential surgical errors.

Main Results:

Laparoscopic surgery has become a leading cause of surgical malpractice litigation.
Specific common laparoscopic operations present unique risks and potential for error.
Understanding the history and evolution aids in identifying areas of concern.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic surgery, despite its benefits, is associated with significant litigation risks.
Awareness of potential errors in common laparoscopic procedures is crucial for patient safety and legal defense.
Further research and training are needed to mitigate risks and address litigation trends.