Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026
Use of Human Perivascular Stem Cells for Bone Regeneration
Published on: May 25, 2012
Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 dose on bone formation in a rat calvarial defect model
Eun-Kyoung Pang1, Se-Ung Im, Chang-Sung Kim
1Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Background:
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are being evaluated for periodontal and bone regenerative therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 (rhBMP-4) dose on local bone formation in a rat calvaria defect model.
Methods:
Calvarial, 8 mm diameter, critical-size osteotomy defects were created in 140 male Sprague-Dawley rats. Seven groups of 20 animals each received either 1) rhBMP-4 (2.5 microg) in an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) carrier, 2) rhBMP-4 (5 microg)/ACS, 3) rhBMP-4 (2.5 microg) in a beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) carrier, 4) rhBMP-4 (5 microg)/beta-TCP, 5) ACS or 6) beta-TCP carrier controls, or 7) a sham-surgery control, and were evaluated by histologic and histometric parameters following a 2- or 8-week healing interval (10 animals/group/healing interval).
Results:
Surgical implantation of rhBMP-4/ACS and rhBMP-4/beta-TCP resulted in enhanced local bone formation at both 2 and 8 weeks. Within the dose range examined, rhBMP-4 did not exhibit an appreciable dose-dependent response. Defect closure was not significantly different between the rhBMP-4/ACS and rhBMP-4/beta-TCP groups. New bone area of the rhBMP-4/ beta-TCP group was significantly greater than that of the rhBMP-4/ ACS group; however, bone density in the rhBMP-4/ACS group was significantly greater than that in the rhBMP-4/beta-TCP group at 8 weeks (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
rhBMP-4 combined with ACS or beta-TCP has a significant potential to induce bone formation in the rat calvaria defect model. Within the selected rhBMP-4 dose range and observation interval, there appeared to be no meaningful differences in bone formation.
