Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: current management and treatment options
Giuseppe Boriani1, Igor Diemberger, Mauro Biffi
1Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. cardio1@med.unibo.it
Insights
Pharmacological cardioversion is a safe and effective option for recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), offering a cost-effective alternative to electrical cardioversion. This approach is suitable for various settings, including emergency departments, for patients without heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia with significant societal costs.
- Treatment practices for AF vary, particularly outside specialized cardiac care.
- Cardioversion aims to restore sinus rhythm, improve cardiac function, and prevent remodeling, but requires risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological cardioversion for recent-onset AF.
- To compare pharmacological and electrical cardioversion strategies.
- To discuss the role of different antiarrhythmic drugs in AF management.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical variables influencing AF treatment strategy selection.
- Analysis of pharmacological agents (Class IC, amiodarone, ibutilide, dofetilide) for cardioversion.
- Consideration of patient factors like left ventricular function and heart failure.
Main Results:
- Pharmacological cardioversion is feasible, safe, and effective for recent-onset AF, especially in non-cardiac settings.
- Class IC agents offer rapid conversion in patients without left ventricular dysfunction.
- Amiodarone remains a standard for heart failure patients, while ibutilide and dofetilide have roles despite cost or specific indications.
Conclusions:
- Pharmacological cardioversion is a valuable alternative to electrical cardioversion for recent-onset AF, particularly in acute care settings.
- Personalized treatment decisions considering risks and patient characteristics are crucial.
- While rhythm control strategies are evolving, pharmacological cardioversion remains a recommendable option for many AF patients.
Abstract:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of arrhythmia, carrying high social costs. It is usually first seen by general practitioners or in emergency departments. Despite the availability of consensus guidelines, considerable variations exist in treatment practice, especially outside specialised cardiological settings. Cardioversion to sinus rhythm aims to: (i) restore the atrial contribution to ventricular filling/output; (ii) regularise ventricular rate; and (iii) interrupt atrial remodelling. Cardioversion always requires careful assessment of potential proarrhythmic and thromboembolic risks, and this translates into the need to personalise treatment decisions. Among the many clinical variables that affect strategy selection, time from onset is crucial. In selected patients, pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset AF can be a safely used, feasible and effective approach, even in internal medicine and emergency departments. In most cases of recent-onset AF, pharmacological cardioversion provides an important--and probably more cost effective--alternative to electrical cardioversion, which can then be employed as a second-line therapy for nonresponders. Class IC agents (flecainide or propafenone), which can be safely used in hospitalised patients with recent-onset AF without left ventricular dysfunction, can provide rapid conversion to sinus rhythm after either intravenous administration or oral loading. Although intravenous amiodarone requires longer conversion times, it is still the standard treatment for patients with heart failure. Ibutilide also provides good conversion rates and could be used for AF patients with left ventricular dysfunction (were it not for high costs). For long-lasting AF most pharmacological treatments have only limited efficacy and electrical cardioversion remains the gold standard in this setting. However, a widely used strategy involves pretreatment with amiodarone in the weeks before planned electrical cardioversion: this provides optimal prophylaxis and can sometimes even restore sinus rhythm. Dofetilide may also be capable of restoring sinus rhythm in up to 25-30% of patients and can be used in patients with heart failure. The potential risk of proarrhythmia increases the need for careful therapeutic decision making and management of pharmacological cardioversion. The results of recent trials (AFFIRM [Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management] and RACE [Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation]) on rate versus rhythm control strategies in the long term have led to a generalised shift in interest towards rate control. Although carefully designed studies are required to better define the role of pharmacological rhythm control in specific AF settings, this alternative option remains a recommendable strategy for many patients, especially those in acute care.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias

