Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interval estimation of the proportion ratio under multiple matching.

Kung-Jong Lui1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-7720, USA. kjl@rohan.sdsu.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|November 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A note on point estimation and interval estimation of the relative treatment effect under a simple crossover design.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2021
Same author

Urinary metabolites of furan in waterpipe tobacco smokers compared to non-smokers in home settings in the US.

Toxicology letters·2020
Same author

Exact Confidence Limits on Some New Measures of Concordance and Discordance in Binary Outcomes.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2020
Same author

Exact interval estimators for some commonly used measures of binary agreement.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Asymptotic and exact interval estimators of the common odds ratio under the sequential parallel comparison design.

Statistical methods in medical research·2018
Same author

Exact and asymptotic tests under the sequential parallel comparison design.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2018

This study introduces new methods for estimating the proportion ratio (PR) or relative risk (RR) in multiple matched studies. The logarithmic transformation of the ratio estimator performed best, especially with varying matched sets.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Traditional interval estimation for proportion ratio (PR) or relative risk (RR) often relies on the odds ratio (OR), which can be inaccurate when outcome proportions are not rare.
  • Accurate estimation of PR or RR is crucial in epidemiological and clinical research for understanding disease risk and treatment effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel asymptotic interval estimators for the common PR (or RR) in the context of multiple matching.
  • To compare the finite sample performance of these new estimators against existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of five new asymptotic interval estimators for the common PR (or RR) under multiple matching.
  • Application of Monte Carlo simulations to assess coverage probability and average confidence interval length.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation across various scenarios, including constant and varying numbers of matching.
  • Main Results:

    • When the number of matching is constant, the logarithmic transformation of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator, the quadratic inequality estimator, and the logarithmic transformation of the ratio estimator demonstrated strong performance.
    • For varying matched sets, particularly with a small number (n=20) of sets, the logarithmic transformation of the ratio estimator emerged as the superior method among the five considered.
    • The study illustrates the practical application of these estimators using data from a clinical trial on supplemental ascorbate in cancer patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed interval estimators offer improved accuracy for PR or RR estimation in multiple matching scenarios, especially when outcome proportions are not rare.
    • The choice of estimator depends on the study design, with the logarithmic transformation of the ratio estimator showing particular promise for designs with varying matched sets.
    • These findings provide valuable tools for researchers needing precise risk estimation in complex epidemiological and clinical studies.