Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026
Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study
Published on: March 14, 2017
Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters
Vinod K Panchbhavi1, Saul Trevino
1Dept. Orthopaedics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0165, USA. vkpanchb@utmb.edu
Background:
The aim of this study was to determine if there are intraobserver and interobserver differences in reliability when measuring hallux valgus angles (HVA), 1-2 intermetatarsal angles (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angles (DMAA) manually compared to computer-assisted means. Our hypothesis was that the measurements taken by computer-assisted methods of these three forefoot angles would be superior in consistency and accuracy compared to manual measurements.
Methods:
Four examiners studied 20 weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of patients with hallux valgus. Manual measurements were taken on photographic prints using a goniometer and a fine point pen. Computer-assisted measurements were taken on digitized images using computer software. Three sets of measurements by both of these methods were taken 1 week apart.
Results:
There was no statistically significant difference between digital and manual measurements for any of the three angles measured (p .05). However, the reliability of measurements within a range of 5 degrees for both methods was 70.6% for HVA, 84% for 1-2 IMA, and 59% for DMAA.
Conclusion:
There were no significant differences in interobserver and intraobserver reliability in measuring 1-2 IMA and HVA, regardless of the method of measurement; however, there was a significant difference in interobserver reliability when measuring the DMAA either on computer or manually (p = <.05).
