Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Introduction to macromolecular refinement.

Dale E Tronrud1

  • 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. dale@uoxray.uoregon.edu

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|December 2, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ten things I `hate' about refinement.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2021
Same author

Making the invisible enemy visible.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2021
Same author

A complete Fourier-synthesis-based backbone-conformation-dependent library for proteins.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2021
Same author

Arginine off-kilter: guanidinium is not as planar as restraints denote.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2020
Same author

A new default restraint library for the protein backbone in Phenix: a conformation-dependent geometry goes mainstream.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2016
Same author

Residue-level global and local ensemble-ensemble comparisons of protein domains.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2015
Same journal

Structural insights into the synthesis of FMN in prokaryotic organisms.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Native sulfur/chlorine SAD phasing for serial femtosecond crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Serial crystallographic analysis of protein isomorphous replacement data from a mixture of native and derivative microcrystals.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

The first crystal structure of the peptidase domain of the U32 peptidase family.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Atomic resolution crystal structure of Sapp2p, a secreted aspartic protease from Candida parapsilosis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Structural characterization of a mitochondrial 3-ketoacyl-CoA (T1)-like thiolase from Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
See all related articles

Refining X-ray diffraction data is computationally intensive. This review compares common refinement packages, detailing their methods and assumptions to aid researchers in selecting the best tool for their specific project.

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • X-ray diffraction data analysis involves complex function minimization.
  • Current computational power limits the ability to perfectly fit experimental data.
  • Various refinement packages exist, each with distinct approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize common X-ray diffraction refinement packages.
  • To detail the underlying methods and assumptions of these packages.
  • To provide guidance for selecting appropriate refinement software.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on X-ray diffraction refinement packages.
  • Comparative analysis of targets, assumptions, and optimization strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of commonly used refinement software.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of key differences in methodologies across refinement packages.
    • Summary of the strengths and limitations associated with various approaches.
    • Highlighting the importance of understanding assumptions for accurate data fitting.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of refinement package significantly impacts the accuracy of X-ray diffraction data fitting.
    • Understanding package-specific methods and assumptions is crucial for successful data analysis.
    • This review serves as a guide for researchers to optimize their refinement strategies.