Related Experiment Videos
Obtaining explicit consent for the use of archival tissue samples: practical issues
1Department of Pathology, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK. pnf1@le.ac.uk
Journal of Medical Ethics
|December 3, 2004
Summary
Obtaining explicit consent for archival tissue research is impractical, delaying vital studies. Most patients consent to the use of surplus biopsy material for research, supporting its continuation.
Area of Science:
- Medical research ethics
- Biobanking and tissue archiving
Background:
- Research ethics committees increasingly require explicit consent for archival tissue use.
- Current UK guidance on obtaining consent for archival tissue research is based on
- practicality,
- but lacks clear evidence or experience for ethics committees to assess this.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the practicality of obtaining general consent for the research use of surplus renal transplant biopsy tissue.
- To evaluate patient willingness for surplus tissue research use.
Main Methods:
- A study was conducted to obtain general consent for research use of surplus tissue from renal transplant biopsies.
- The study targeted the entire patient population of a renal transplant unit in Leicester.
Main Results:
- 495 letters were sent, and attempts were made to contact non-responders during outpatient clinic visits.
- After one year, the opinions of 26% of patients regarding consent for research use of their tissue remained unobtained.
Conclusions:
- The majority of patients are amenable to the use of surplus biopsy material for research.
- Mandatory explicit consent for archival tissue research can significantly delay or obstruct research, potentially harming patient interests and public good.
- The challenge in the UK has shifted from preventing unauthorized tissue use to preventing authorized tissue use due to consent requirements.