Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026
An Educational Video Demonstration of How to Prone a Critically Ill Intubated Patient
Published on: November 30, 2022
Influence of sleep position experience on ability of prone-sleeping infants to escape from asphyxiating
Dorota A Paluszynska1, Kathleen A Harris, Bradley T Thach
1Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63010, USA.
Insights
Infants inexperienced in prone sleep struggle to escape suffocating environments, increasing their risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Learning to reposition the head is crucial for safe sleep.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Sleep Medicine
- Infant Safety Research
- Developmental Pediatrics
Background:
- Infants sleeping on their back or side who are new to prone sleeping face a higher risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
- Inexperienced prone sleepers are more likely to be found in a face-down position at death.
- Lack of prone sleeping experience may impair an infant's ability to change head position and avoid asphyxiation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hypothesis that inexperience in prone sleeping is linked to difficulties in head repositioning to avoid asphyxiating environments.
- To compare the protective behaviors of infants experienced versus inexperienced in prone sleep when exposed to a mildly asphyxiating condition.
Main Methods:
- Studied 38 healthy infants (half experienced, half inexperienced in prone sleep) under mild asphyxiation via soft bedding covering their faces.
- Monitored inspired carbon dioxide (CO2I), electrocardiogram, respiration, and videotaped head movements.
- Assessed gross motor development using the Denver Development Scale.
Main Results:
- All infants experienced mild asphyxia and attempted escape using 3 head-repositioning strategies.
- Infants inexperienced in prone sleep exhibited less effective protective behaviors compared to experienced infants.
- Experienced prone sleepers demonstrated advanced gross motor development.
Conclusions:
- Infants inexperienced in prone sleeping have a reduced capacity to escape asphyxiating conditions.
- This decreased ability may explain the elevated SIDS risk and face-down positioning in inexperienced infants.
- Airway protective behaviors in prone sleep appear to be learned through experience.
Objective:
Several studies have found that back- or side-sleeping infants who are inexperienced in prone sleeping are at much higher risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) when they turn to prone or are placed prone for sleep compared with infants who normally sleep prone. Moreover, such inexperienced infants are more likely to be found in the face-down position at death after being placed prone compared with SIDS infants who are experienced in prone sleeping. We hypothesized that lack of experience in prone sleeping is associated with increased difficulty in changing head position to avoid an asphyxiating sleep environment.
Methods:
We studied 38 healthy infants while they slept prone. Half of these were experienced and half were inexperienced in prone sleeping. To create a mildly asphyxiating microenvironment, we placed infants to sleep prone with their faces covered by soft bedding. We recorded inspired CO2 (CO2I), electrocardiogram, and respiration, and we videotaped head movements. Also, we assessed gross motor development (Denver Development Scale).
Results:
When sleeping prone, with their faces covered by bedding, all infants experienced mild asphyxia as a result of rebreathing. All aroused and attempted escape from this environment. Infants used 3 stereotyped head-repositioning strategies. The least effective was nuzzling into the bedding with occasional brief head lifts. More effective were head lifts combined with a head turn. Some infants, however, could turn only to 1 side, right or left. Infants who were inexperienced in prone sleeping had less effective protective behaviors than experienced infants. Infant age did not correlate with efficacy of protective behaviors. Infants who were experienced in prone sleep had advanced gross motor development compared with inexperienced infants.
Conclusion:
Infants who are inexperienced in prone sleeping have decreased ability to escape from asphyxiating sleep environments when placed prone. These observations potentially explain the increased risk associated with prone sleep in infants who are inexperienced. The increased occurrence of the face-down position in such infants is also potentially explained. These findings suggest that airway protective behaviors may be acquired through the mechanism of operant conditioning (learning).
Related Concept Videos
01:11Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
01:22Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management