Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microbial reduction of U(VI) at the solid-water interface.

Ong-Hun Jeon1, Shelly D Kelly, Kenneth M Kemner

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0206, USA.

Environmental Science & Technology
|December 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Europium Coordination Structure in Peptide Complexes Resolved with Simulation and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Variations in the Optical and Molecular Composition of Dissolved Organic Matter Exported from Coastal Wetlands.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Optimizing Cryo-Focused Pyrolysis GC/MS for Tracing Soil Organic Matter Across Diverse Ecosystems.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Microbial reduction of low-crystallinity tripuhyite (FeSbO<sub>4</sub>): Implications for Sb(V) cycling in contaminated environments.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Metallic θ-phase tantalum nitride has a thermal conductivity triple that of copper.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

High-density biomass as a substrate for stimulating biosulfidogenesis in the deep layer of stratified acidic pit lakes.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities: Time for a Reboot.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Coordination-Engineered Fe Single Atoms Enable Synergistic PVC Upcycling into Fuel-Range Hydrocarbons via Fenton-Like Pathway.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Ambitious Co-scaling of Carbon Dioxide Removal and Decarbonization Delivers Better Climate Outcomes Than Strategies That Prioritize Efforts in One Domain.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Can Data Mining Improve Methane Correction Factors for Urban, Nonsewered Sanitation?

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Meteorologically Driven Changes in Future Global Air Quality: Physical and Monetized Impacts.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same journal

Microbiome-Based Framework for Achieving Simultaneous Efficient Transformation of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Restored Biogeochemical Cycling.

Environmental science & technology·2026
See all related articles

Microbial reduction of uranium (U(VI)) is slower with natural iron oxides than synthetic ones. Electron shuttling agents like anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) can enhance uranium bioremediation in soils and sediments.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Geochemistry
  • Bioremediation

Background:

  • Uranium (U(VI)) contamination poses environmental risks.
  • Microbial reduction is a key process for uranium immobilization.
  • The role of mineral surfaces in microbial U(VI) reduction is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the microbial reduction of U(VI) by Geobacter sulfurreducens.
  • To compare U(VI) reduction rates on synthetic versus natural iron oxides.
  • To assess the impact of electron shuttling agents on U(VI) bioremediation.

Main Methods:

  • Microbial reduction experiments using Geobacter sulfurreducens.
  • Uranium speciation analysis in the presence of synthetic and natural iron oxides.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of electron transfer using anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS).

    • Main Results:

    • Microbial U(VI) reduction was comparable on synthetic Fe(III) oxides and aqueous U(VI).
    • U(VI) reduction was slower and less extensive on natural Fe(III) oxide-containing solids.
    • AQDS enhanced both Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction rates and extent.

    Conclusions:

    • Surface site heterogeneity in natural solids can limit microbial U(VI) reduction rates.
    • Electron shuttling agents can enhance U(VI) bioremediation effectiveness.
    • Understanding mineral-surface interactions is crucial for in situ uranium bioremediation strategies.