Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Concerns about ceramics in THA.

Robert L Barrack1, Corey Burak, Harry B Skinner

  • 1Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. rbarrack@mail.com

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|December 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is Inflammatory Arthritis an Absolute Indication for Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Surgeon Experience Influences Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Risk, But It Is Mitigated by Robotic Assistance.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

The Cementless, Triple-Tapered, Collared Stem Has Minimal Proximal Femoral Stress Shielding at One Year.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Robotic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrates Improved Recovery During the First 90 Postoperative Days Compared With Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Remote Monitoring Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Contemporary insights into hinged knee arthroplasties : biomechanics, indications, and outcomes in complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2025
Same author

Does robotic assistance influence recovery after total knee arthroplasty? : a prospective study using daily remote patient monitoring.

The bone & joint journal·2025
Same journal

Which Factors Are Associated With Death, Local Recurrence, and Perioperative Complications After En Bloc Resection for Primary Malignant Tumors of the Mobile Spine?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

Modern ceramic hip implants offer improvements but still face wear and fracture risks. Ongoing research aims to enhance durability and address concerns for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Materials Engineering

Background:

  • Advanced ceramic materials represent an improvement over earlier options for total hip arthroplasty (THA).
  • Despite advancements, ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in THA are susceptible to wear and surface damage.
  • Concerns persist regarding the long-term performance and potential failure modes of ceramic hip implants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the persistent concerns associated with ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in total hip arthroplasty.
  • To identify specific failure mechanisms and complications related to ceramic bearing surfaces.
  • To highlight areas for future research and development in ceramic hip implant technology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on ceramic hip implant performance and complications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of reported wear patterns, including stripe wear and microseparation.
  • Examination of factors contributing to catastrophic failure and revision surgery.

    • Main Results:

    • Ceramic articulations are prone to wear and surface damage, influenced by factors like cup positioning and impingement.
    • Stripe wear patterns indicate microseparation during gait, while catastrophic failure, though rare, remains a concern.
    • Revision surgeries for ceramic fractures can be complicated by abrasive debris, and modular interface issues also generate debris.

    Conclusions:

    • While superior to older materials, current ceramic THA components require further improvements to fully mitigate risks.
    • Addressing concerns such as wear, fracture, debris generation, and intraoperative limitations is crucial.
    • Continued advancements in manufacturing and design are necessary to optimize the performance and safety of ceramic hip implants.