Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the chief nurse executive: reflections on the process.

Marie P Farrell1

  • 1Department of Nursing, California State University-Bakersfield, 9001 Stockdale Highway, Bakersfield, CA 93303, USA. mfarrell@csub.edu

The Journal of Nursing Administration
|December 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

The CNO-CFO Dyad: A Strategic Driver of Organizational Performance.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Elements of Effective Professional Governance: An Integrative Review.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

New Nurse Well-Being: Implications for Retention, Job Satisfaction, and Patient Safety.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Virtual Nursing Programs in Acute Care Settings: A Scoping Review of Patient, Nurse, and System-Level Outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Occupational Fatigue and Cognitive Performance Among Front-Line Nurse Leaders: The Interplay of Personal and Work Factors.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Resilience and Well-Being Among Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mindfulness and Narrative Interventions.

The Journal of nursing administration·2026

Evaluating chief nurse executives (CNEs) in large healthcare systems presents unique challenges. Staff perceptions reveal concerns impacting trust, careers, and patient care, necessitating a review of current evaluation processes.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Nursing Leadership
  • Organizational Psychology

Background:

  • Performance improvement for Chief Nurse Executives (CNEs) is crucial for healthcare.
  • Evaluating CNEs is complex and resource-intensive.
  • Formal evaluation differs significantly between stand-alone hospitals and large integrated systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore staff perceptions of the CNE evaluation process within a large healthcare system.
  • To identify key concerns influencing the effectiveness and fairness of CNE evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative reflection on staff perceptions.
  • Analysis of concerns related to trust, careers, organization, patients, and self-perception.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Staff express significant concerns regarding the CNE evaluation process.
  • Issues of trust and professional development are prominent.
  • Evaluations impact perceptions of the organization, patient care, and individual well-being.

Conclusions:

  • The current CNE evaluation process in large systems may not adequately address staff concerns.
  • Addressing issues of trust and career development is vital for effective CNE evaluation.
  • Further research is needed to refine evaluation methods in complex healthcare settings.