Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stem cell assays: something old, something new, something borrowed.

Ronald van Os1, Leonie M Kamminga, Gerald de Haan

  • 1Department of Stem Cell Biology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. r.p.van.os@med.rug.nl

Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio)
|December 8, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacological targeting of CBX7 alters the epigenetic landscape and induces differentiation of leukemic cells.

Blood neoplasia·2025
Same author

Aberrant engagement of P-selectin drives hematopoietic stem cell aging in mice.

Nature aging·2025
Same author

CBX7 inhibitors affect H3K9 methyltransferase-regulated gene repression in leukemic cells.

Experimental hematology·2024
Same author

Polychromatic Flow Cytometry to Identify Rare Aged Hematopoietic Stem Cell Subpopulations.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2024
Same author

How CBX proteins regulate normal and leukemic blood cells.

FEBS letters·2024
Same author

CD61 identifies a superior population of aged murine HSCs and is required to preserve quiescence and self-renewal.

Blood advances·2023
Same journal

Brent A. Reynolds, pioneer of adult neural stem cell biology.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2026
Same journal

CircVapa promotes the abnormal differentiation of small intestinal epithelial stem cells in diabetic state.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2026
Same journal

Transforming Growth Factor beta-2 (TGFβ2) Drives Trabecular Meshwork Progenitor Cell Differentiation Through SMAD2/3 Signalling.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2026
Same journal

Circular RNA circEGFR overexpression attenuates chemosensitivity and enhances cancer stemness via targeting IGF2BP2/SOX2 in breast cancer cells.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2026
Same journal

Regeneration of the mammalian brain: a relic of evolution?

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2026
Same journal

Mitochondrial transfer technologies with molecular insights into clinical applications.

Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio)·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating stem cell function requires multiple assays, particularly in vivo methods, to accurately assess potential. This approach is crucial for defining stem cell activity and resolving controversies in stem cell research.

Area of Science:

  • Stem cell biology
  • Cellular assays
  • Regenerative medicine

Background:

  • Numerous stem cell assays exist, with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) being the most studied.
  • Stem cell research faces controversies due to technical issues and semantic debates, especially concerning stem cell plasticity.
  • Emerging fields studying non-HSCs often lack established, reliable assays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the history and future of stem cell assays.
  • To address controversies and define criteria for justified stem cell activity claims.
  • To provide recommendations for robust stem cell characterization.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on stem cell assays, focusing on hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and emerging stem cell types.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of technical and semantic issues in stem cell research.
  • Evaluation of the retrospective assessment of stem cell potential.

    • Main Results:

    • Conflicting results arise when cells exhibit stem cell characteristics in some assays but not others.
    • The true potential of stem cells is best assessed retrospectively.
    • Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) assays offer valuable lessons for non-HSC research.

    Conclusions:

    • Multiple stem cell assays, including at least one in vivo assay, are recommended for comprehensive functionality assessment.
    • A standardized approach using multiple assays is needed to define stem cell activity and justify claims.
    • Retrospective functional assessment is key to understanding true stem cell potential.