Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
The measurement of coping responses: validity of the Billings and Moos Coping Checklist
Melissa Oxlad1, Lauren Miller-Lewis, Tracey D Wade
1School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. melissa.oxlad@flinders.edu.au
Objective:
The primary aim of the study was to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of the modified Coping Checklist.
Methods:
Self-report questionnaires asking about coping responses and mental health were administered to 515 undergraduate university students and to 119 patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Confirmatory (CFA) and exploratory factor analyses (PCA) were used to summarize and describe coping responses.
Results:
CFA indicated that the subscale structure originally proposed for the Coping Checklist did not adequately fit the data. Subsequent PCA resulted in four factors: (1) Positive reappraisal; (2) Seeking support; (3) Avoidance; and (4) Information seeking. Internal consistencies ranged between .41 and .62 and 12-week test-retest reliability ranged between .59 and .71. Evidence for the concurrent validity of the solution generated by PCA was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the four factors identified and demographic and psychosocial measures.
Conclusion:
Even with modifications to the Coping Checklist, it is recommended that researchers investigate alternative methods of assessing coping responses in health psychology settings.
Related Concept Videos
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
Coping Strategies: Emotion Focused
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping