Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodology and reporting of randomised controlled trials.

W C H Jacobs1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6522 JV or P.O. Box 9011, 6500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands. w.jacobs@maartenskliniek.nl

The Knee
|December 8, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Systematic reviews require high-quality trials for evidence-based medicine (EBM). Current literature often lacks rigorous randomization, blinding, and clear reporting, hindering reliable medical evidence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical Restoration of Sagittal Alignment of the Spine: Correlation with Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JBJS reviews·2020
Same author

Chordoma: a systematic review of the epidemiology and clinical prognostic factors predicting progression-free and overall survival.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2018
Same author

A systematic review of prognostic factors predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2017
Same author

Bicruciate substituting design does not improve maximal flexion in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2014
Same author

A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies.

The bone & joint journal·2013
Same author

Systematic review of prognostic factors predicting outcome in non-surgically treated patients with sciatica.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2013

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine (EBM)

Background:

  • Systematic literature reviews are crucial for evidence-based medicine (EBM).
  • Shortcomings in trial design, execution, and reporting can compromise the reliability of systematic reviews.
  • Key issues include inadequate randomization, blinding, outcome assessment, and data reporting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify critical limitations in the design, execution, and reporting of clinical trials.
  • To discuss the principles and provide solutions for improving trial quality.
  • To enhance the utility of systematic reviews for evidence-based medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of literature on clinical trial methodology.
  • Analysis of common shortcomings in randomization, blinding, outcome assessment, and data reporting.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of principles and proposed improvements.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant deficiencies identified in randomization processes across numerous trials.
    • Inconsistent or absent blinding procedures noted.
    • Variability and lack of standardization in outcome assessments and data reporting.
    • Failures in adhering to established guidelines for trial conduct and reporting.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to strict guidelines in trial design, execution, and reporting is essential for EBM.
    • Addressing identified shortcomings in randomization, blinding, outcome assessment, and reporting is critical.
    • Implementing proposed solutions can improve the quality of evidence for systematic reviews and EBM.