Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Action, verbal response and spatial reasoning.

Ranxiao Frances Wang1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, 603 E. Daniel St, Room 533, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. francesw@s.psych.uiuc.edu

Cognition
|December 8, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of task type on spontaneous alternations of attentional states.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on vision: Oscillations in performance can be enhanced, but not induced.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2022
Same author

Human navigation in curved spaces.

Cognition·2021
Same author

Spontaneous state alternations in the time course of mind wandering.

Cognition·2021
Same author

Preference for prior probabilities of positions under incongruent visual information.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same author

Assessing Postural Instability and Cybersickness Through Linear and Angular Displacement.

Human factors·2019
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Spatial reasoning differs between perception and action. Action tasks show unbiased spatial information, while verbal responses are unaffected by orientation changes, indicating distinct cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Perception of spatial properties (distance, orientation, size) can be independent of action capabilities.
  • The action system may provide more accurate spatial information than perceptual or verbal systems.
  • Understanding the dissociation between perception and action is crucial for cognitive science.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differences between action-based and verbal responses in a spatial reasoning task.
  • To determine if the action and verbal systems process spatial information differently.
  • To explore the nature of the dissociation between spatial perception and motor action.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in a spatial reasoning task involving imagined self-orientation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two response types were used: pointing to target locations and verbally reporting egocentric directions.
  • Reaction time (RT) and error rates were measured in relation to angular disparity.

    • Main Results:

    • Pointing responses showed increased RT and errors with greater angular disparity between imagined and actual heading.
    • Verbal responses were unaffected by angular disparity, indicating knowledge of target direction.
    • Performance differences suggest distinct information or processing in verbal versus action systems.

    Conclusions:

    • The study demonstrates a fundamental distinction between the verbal and action systems in spatial reasoning.
    • These systems appear to utilize qualitatively different information or cognitive processes.
    • Findings support the dissociation of spatial information processing for perception/verbalization versus motor action.