Related Experiment Videos
A practical longitudinal model for evaluating growth in Gelbvieh cattle
K R Robbins1, I Misztal, J K Bertrand
1Animal and Dairy Science Department, The University of Georgia, Athens 30602-2771, USA. krobbin1@uga.edu <krobbin1@uga.edu>
Journal of Animal Science
|December 8, 2004
Summary
Random regression (RRM) analysis effectively evaluates growth traits in Gelbvieh beef cattle, incorporating all records for accurate genetic predictions. This method offers similar computing efficiency to multiple-trait (MTM) analysis.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics and Breeding
- Quantitative Genetics
- Livestock Production
Background:
- Genetic evaluation of growth traits in beef cattle is crucial for breeding programs.
- Traditional multiple-trait (MTM) analysis excludes records outside specific age ranges, potentially losing valuable data.
- A significant portion of records for weaning weight (Wwt) and yearling weight (Ywt) fall outside accepted MTM ranges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of random regression (RRM) analysis with multiple-trait (MTM) analysis for genetic evaluation of growth in Gelbvieh beef cattle.
- To assess the impact of including all available records versus only those within MTM age ranges on breeding value predictions.
Main Methods:
- Two RRM evaluations were conducted using cubic Legendre polynomials (RRML) and linear splines (RRMS) with three knots.
- Data Set 1 (d1) included all available records; Data Set 2 (d2) used only records within MTM age ranges.
- Convergence was achieved for RRML models after imposing diagonalization, with longitudinal models converging faster than MTM.
Main Results:
- Correlations between MTM and RRM (RRML-d2, RRMS-d2) were high (>=0.99) for all traits when using data within MTM ranges.
- Including all records (RRML-d1, RRMS-d1) resulted in slightly lower correlations for Wwt and Ywt compared to MTM, indicating the influence of additional data.
- RRM demonstrated the ability to incorporate records from all ages with computing costs comparable to MTM.
Conclusions:
- Random regression analysis is a viable and effective alternative to multiple-trait analysis for genetic evaluation of growth in Gelbvieh cattle.
- RRM allows for the utilization of all available performance records, potentially leading to more accurate breeding value predictions.
- The RRM approach offers computational efficiency similar to MTM while providing greater flexibility in data inclusion.