Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning nonadjacent dependencies: no need for algebraic-like computations.

Pierre Perruchet1, Michael D Tyler, Nadine Galland

  • 1Laboratory for the Study of Learning and Development/National Center for Scientific Research (LEAD/CNRS), University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France. pierre.perruchet@u-bourgogne.fr

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|December 9, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the neural mechanisms for infants' perception of native and non-native speech.

Brain and language·2023
Same author

Morphology as an aid in orthographic learning of new words: The influence of inflected and derived forms in spelling acquisition.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2023
Same author

How Tone, Intonation and Emotion Shape the Development of Infants' Fundamental Frequency Perception.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

The contribution of visual articulatory gestures and orthography to speech processing: Evidence from novel word learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2021
Same author

Effects of vowel coproduction on the timecourse of tone recognition.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same author

Stroop interference depends also on the level of automaticity of the to-be-interfered process.

Acta psychologica·2019
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

This study challenges previous findings on learning nonadjacent event relations. Re-analyzing data reveals that associative mechanisms, not complex computations, explain these learning capabilities in humans.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Previous research suggested humans require algebraic-like computations to learn relations between nonadjacent events.
  • This claim was based on specific experimental conditions and interpretations of data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the evidence for rule-based computations in learning nonadjacent dependencies.
  • To investigate the role of associative mechanisms in processing complex linguistic structures.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation studies to model learning processes.
  • Experimental data re-analysis to identify methodological flaws.
  • Comparison of findings with associative and rule-based theories.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Methodological inadequacies were found in the original studies supporting algebraic computation.
  • When flawed data were excluded, experimental results aligned with associative learning theories.
  • Nonadjacent dependencies in natural language can be explained by associative mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • The need for rule-based computations in human adaptation to complex structures is questioned.
  • Ubiquitous associative mechanisms provide a sufficient explanation for learning nonadjacent event relations.
  • This reappraisal has significant implications for understanding human language acquisition and cognitive abilities.