In vitro activity of cefepime and cefpirome compared to other third-generation cephem antibiotics against gram-negative nosocomial pathogens
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
1Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, College of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. tumah@just.edu.jo
Abstract:
The in vitro activities of new expanded spectrum of fourth-generation cephalosporins, cefepime and cefpirome, were compared with those of three third-generation cephalosporins, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone, that are commonly used in the treatment of serious infections caused by aerobic gram-negative bacteria. The agar dilution method described by the US National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics tested. 302 clinical isolates, representing a cross-section of Klebsiella and Enterobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested. Cefepime was considerably more active than other antibiotics tested, against Klebsiella species and Enterobacter species, and demonstrated activity similar to ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime was active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa but was less potent against Enterobacter species. Cefoperazone and ceftriaxone were less active than ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cefepime had slightly greater activity than cefpirome against the gram-negative bacteria tested. However, cefepime and cefpirome were found to be highly active against many resistant organisms that traditionally have been difficult to treat.
Insights
New fourth-generation cephalosporins, cefepime and cefpirome, show enhanced in vitro activity against gram-negative bacteria, including resistant strains. These antibiotics offer promising treatment options for serious infections.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Aerobic gram-negative bacteria cause serious infections.
- Third-generation cephalosporins (cefoperazone, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone) are commonly used.
- Emergence of antibiotic resistance necessitates evaluation of new agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare in vitro activities of fourth-generation cephalosporins (cefepime, cefpirome) with third-generation agents.
- Evaluate efficacy against clinical isolates of Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- Assess potential for treating infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacteria.
Main Methods:
- Agar dilution method standardized by the US National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
- Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for tested antibiotics.
- Testing against 302 clinical isolates of Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Main Results:
- Cefepime demonstrated superior in vitro activity against Klebsiella and Enterobacter species compared to other tested antibiotics.
- Cefepime exhibited activity comparable to ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
- Cefepime and cefpirome showed significant activity against many resistant gram-negative organisms.
Conclusions:
- Fourth-generation cephalosporins, cefepime and cefpirome, possess broad-spectrum in vitro activity against clinically relevant gram-negative bacteria.
- Cefepime and cefpirome are effective against resistant strains, offering potential therapeutic advantages.
- These agents represent valuable options for treating serious infections caused by challenging gram-negative pathogens.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA