Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mixed-effects and fMRI studies.

K J Friston1, K E Stephan, T E Lund

  • 1The Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Neuroimage
|December 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

Canalization and plasticity in psychopathology.

Neuropharmacology·2022
Same author

REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics.

Pharmacological reviews·2019
Same author

A validation of dynamic causal modelling for 7T fMRI.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2018
Same author

Laminar fMRI and computational theories of brain function.

NeuroImage·2017
Same author

Neurophysiologically-informed markers of individual variability and pharmacological manipulation of human cortical gamma.

NeuroImage·2017
Same journal

Category-selective neural decreases in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex as defined with intracranial recordings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

EEG-Based Brain Fingerprints Elicited by Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

The Association between Brain Oscillatory Activity and Immediate Memory under Different Magnetoencephalography Paradigms: A population-based Study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Brain response to awe experiences in virtual reality: an integrated linear and nonlinear EEG analysis.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Convergent imaging and genetic signatures of gray matter atrophy in Parkinson's disease.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

What actually matters in multi-compartment EEG head models: A controlled FEM study of parcellation granularity, skull layering, mesh quality, noise, and inverse solver.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

This study clarifies mixed-effect (MFX) analyses in multisession functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) by comparing a full MFX approach with the common two-stage summary statistics method. The findings highlight when these statistical approaches yield different results in fMRI group analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Statistical analysis
  • Cognitive neuroscience

Background:

  • Multisession functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies commonly employ a two-stage summary statistics procedure for group-level analysis.
  • The relationship between this widely adopted procedure and full mixed-effect (MFX) analyses in fMRI is not always clear.
  • Understanding these statistical approaches is crucial for accurate population inference in neuroimaging research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the relationship between full mixed-effect (MFX) analyses and the two-stage summary statistics procedure in multisession fMRI.
  • To introduce a procedure for full MFX analyses using restricted maximum likelihood (ReML) estimates within statistical parametric mapping.
  • To compare the outcomes of full MFX analysis with the two-stage approach and identify conditions for divergence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Description of a novel procedure for full mixed-effect (MFX) analyses in statistical parametric mapping.
  • Utilized restricted maximum likelihood (ReML) estimates of covariance components for the MFX approach.
  • Comparative analysis between the full MFX procedure and the conventional two-stage summary statistics method for fMRI group data.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a method to implement full mixed-effect (MFX) analyses in statistical parametric mapping for multisession fMRI.
  • Provided a direct comparison between full MFX and two-stage summary statistics analyses.
  • Identified specific scenarios where the two analytical approaches produce divergent results in fMRI group inference.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed ReML-based procedure enables full mixed-effect (MFX) analyses in statistical parametric mapping for fMRI.
  • Full MFX analyses offer a more comprehensive approach to group-level inference in multisession fMRI compared to the two-stage method.
  • Researchers should be aware of the conditions under which the two-stage procedure may lead to different conclusions than a full MFX analysis.