Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Compression forces generated by Mini bone screws--a comparative study done on bone model.

Deepthi Nandan Adla1, C Kitsis, A W Miles

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Engineering, University of Cardiff, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK. deepthinandan@doctors.org.uk

Injury
|December 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author reply to letter to the editor.

Injury·2022
Same author

Antibiotic elution from bone cement: A study of common cement-antibiotic combinations.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

The effect of preparatory technique on the compressive properties of morsellised bone graft.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

Keyholes in acetabular preparation.

Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy·2017
Same author

Effect of trunnion roughness and length on the modular taper junction strength under typical intraoperative assembly forces.

Medical engineering & physics·2016
Same author

Upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis following a clavicular fracture.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2016

The AO/ASIF cannulated screw with a support screw provided superior compression compared to other small bone screws. Mini-Acutrak and Herbert/Whipple screws offered similar compression, outperforming the cortical screw.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic biomechanics
  • Biomaterials science
  • Surgical instrumentation

Background:

  • Bone fracture fixation relies on screws to provide compression and stability.
  • Various screw designs exist, each with potentially different biomechanical properties.
  • Understanding screw compression capabilities is crucial for selecting optimal fixation devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the compressive forces generated by different small bone screw designs.
  • To quantify the fixation capabilities of AO/ASIF cannulated screws, Mini-Acutrak, and Herbert/Whipple screws.

Main Methods:

  • Laboratory testing using simulated cancellous bone.
  • Measurement of compressive forces with a load cell washer.
  • Evaluation of AO/ASIF 3.0 mm cannulated cancellous screws, 2.0 mm cortical screws, Mini-Acutrak, and Herbert/Whipple screws.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Herbert/Whipple and Mini-Acutrak screws exhibited similar compression, exceeding that of the cortical screw.
  • The AO/ASIF cannulated screw with a support screw demonstrated double the compressive capacity of the 2.0 mm cortical screw.
  • Mini-Acutrak screws achieved 70% of the compression of the larger cancellous screw.

Conclusions:

  • The AO/ASIF cannulated screw, when augmented with a support screw, offers significant compression.
  • Headless screws like Mini-Acutrak and Herbert/Whipple provide substantial compression for small bone fixation.
  • Screw design and configuration significantly impact compressive force generation in simulated cancellous bone.