Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The brain and the law.

Terrence Chorvat1, Kevin McCabe

  • 1School of Law, George Mason University, 3301 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22201, USA. tchorvat@gmu.edu

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|December 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Neuroscience reveals human decision-making is complex, exceeding standard economic models. Understanding these cognitive processes can improve legal systems and enhance social welfare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The caudate signals bad reputation during trust decisions.

PloS one·2013
Same author

Aberrant reward center response to partner reputation during a social exchange game in generalized social phobia.

Depression and anxiety·2013
Same author

Oxytocin selectively increases perceptions of harm for victims but not the desire to punish offenders of criminal offenses.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2012
Same author

Oxytocin receptor genetic variation promotes human trust behavior.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2012
Same author

Reduction of the Earth's magnetic field inhibits growth rates of model cancer cell lines.

Bioelectromagnetics·2010
Same author

Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2010

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Law and Neuroscience

Background:

  • Traditional legal frameworks often rely on simplified models of human decision-making.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the complexities and limitations of human cognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore current neuroscience research on human decision-making mechanisms relevant to law.
  • To examine the interplay between legal systems and cognitive processes.
  • To identify implications for legal reform and social welfare.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current neuroscience research findings.
  • Analysis of decision-making models in economics and law.
  • Discussion of cognitive processes influencing legal contexts.

Main Results:

  • Human decision-making capabilities are broader than predicted by standard economic models.
  • Cognitive limitations exist that are often overlooked by traditional legal and economic theories.
  • Law is shaped by cognitive processes, and conversely, law influences cognition.

Conclusions:

  • Neuroscience offers valuable insights into legal decision-making.
  • Legal systems can be optimized by incorporating an understanding of neural mechanisms.
  • This approach can lead to improved social welfare outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos