Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Hepatic vein transit times using a microbubble agent can predict disease severity non-invasively in patients with
A K P Lim1, S D Taylor-Robinson, N Patel
1Imaging Sciences Department, MRC Clinical Services Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, The Robert Steiner MR Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK. a.lim@ic.co.uk
Insights
Hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) using ultrasound contrast effectively assess hepatitis C liver disease severity. This non-invasive method differentiates mild hepatitis from cirrhosis, offering a potential alternative to biopsy.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Ultrasound Contrast Agents
Background:
- Non-invasive assessment of diffuse liver disease severity is crucial.
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes significant liver damage.
- Current diagnostic methods may be invasive or lack precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) for grading and staging diffuse liver disease.
- To assess the utility of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents in HCV patients.
- To determine if HVTT can differentiate between stages of liver disease.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 85 treatment-naive HCV patients with biopsy-proven liver disease.
- Ultrasound microbubble contrast agent (Levovist) injected intravenously.
- Hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) measured using spectral Doppler; carotid delay times (CDT) also calculated.
Main Results:
- HVTT showed a monotonic decrease with increasing liver disease severity (mild hepatitis, moderate/severe hepatitis, cirrhosis).
- Significant differences in HVTT and CDT were observed between disease groups (p<0.001).
- HVTT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity for diagnosing cirrhosis.
Conclusions:
- HVTT using ultrasound contrast effectively assesses HCV-related liver disease severity.
- HVTT clearly differentiates between mild hepatitis and cirrhosis.
- HVTT is a valuable, potentially non-invasive tool that may complement or replace liver biopsy in certain cases.
Background And Aims:
A reliable non-invasive assessment of the severity of diffuse liver disease is much needed. We investigated the utility of hepatic vein transit times (HVTT) for grading and staging diffuse liver disease in a cohort of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection using an ultrasound microbubble contrast agent as a tracer.
Materials And Methods:
Eighty five untreated patients with biopsy proven HCV induced liver disease were studied prospectively. All were HCV RNA positive on polymerase chain reaction testing. Based on their histological fibrosis (F) and necroinflammatory (NI) scores, untreated patients were divided into mild hepatitis (F < or =2/6, NI < or =3/18), moderate/severe hepatitis (3 < or =F <6 or NI > or =4), and cirrhosis (F=6/6) groups. In addition, 20 age matched healthy volunteers were studied. After an overnight fast, a bolus of contrast agent (Levovist) was injected into an antecubital vein and spectral Doppler signals were recorded from both the right and middle hepatic veins for analysis. HVTTs were calculated as the time from injection to a sustained rise in Doppler signal >10% above baseline. The Doppler signals from the carotid artery were also measured in 60 patients and carotid delay times (CDT) calculated as the difference between carotid and hepatic vein arrival times. The earliest HVTT in each patient was used for analysis.
Results:
Mean (SEM) HVTT for the control, mild hepatitis, moderate/severe hepatitis, and cirrhosis groups showed a monotonic decrease of 38.1 (2.8), 38.8 (2.4), 26.0 (2.4), and 15.8 (0.8) seconds, respectively. Mean (SEM) CDT for the control, mild hepatitis, moderate/severe hepatitis, and cirrhosis patients again showed progressive shortening of 30.3 (2.6), 25.9 (2.6), 14.8 (2.1), and 5.6 (1.2) seconds, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups for HVTT (ANOVA, p<0.001) and CDT (ANOVA, p<0.001). There was 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity for diagnosing cirrhosis and 95% sensitivity and 86% specificity for differentiating mild hepatitis from more severe liver disease.
Conclusion:
We have shown, for the first time, that HVTT using an ultrasound microbubble contrast agent can assess HCV related liver disease with clear differentiation between mild hepatitis and cirrhosis. There were significant differences between these two groups and the moderate/severe hepatitis group. CDT offers no additional benefit or greater differentiation than HVTT and can be omitted, thus simplifying this technique. HVTT may complement liver biopsy and may also be a useful alternative for assessment of liver disease in patients who have contraindications to biopsy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Transit, Absorption and Dissolution Time
One of the key parameters is the mean transit time (MTT), which refers to the total duration required for drug molecules to transit through the body. MTT is determined by calculating the ratio of the area under the moment curve to the area...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

