Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Todd R Jenkins¹

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

|December 14, 2004

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effect of Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation on Dysmenorrhea.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016

Same author

The use of quality metrics in health care: primum non nocere and the law of unintended consequences.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2016

Same author

The future of obstetrics/gynecology in 2020: a clearer vision: finding true north and the forces of change.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2014

Same author

The future of obstetrics/gynecology in 2020: a clearer vision. Why is change needed?

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2014

Same author

The future of obstetrics/gynecology in 2020: a clearer vision. Transformational forces and thriving in the new system.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2014

Same author

The new American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 years later: looking back and moving forward.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2012

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy shows promise for abnormal uterine bleeding, but more research is needed. Randomized trials are required to determine its true value compared to other hysterectomy methods.

Area of Science:

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
Surgical Outcomes Research

Background:

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) emerged in the 1990s for abnormal uterine bleeding.
Existing literature, primarily case series, suggests LSH offers reduced operating time, blood loss, and faster recovery than laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).
A randomized trial indicated LSH provides superior patient satisfaction over hysteroscopic endometrial resection at two years with comparable costs.

Purpose of the Study:

To review existing literature on laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
To evaluate the evidence supporting the proposed benefits and risks of LSH.
To identify the need for further high-quality research.

Main Methods:

Literature review of existing studies on laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of retrospective comparisons and case series.

Evaluation of one randomized controlled trial comparing LSH to hysteroscopic endometrial resection.

Main Results:

Limited randomized controlled trials exist for LSH, with none comparing it to total vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy.
Existing studies suggest potential advantages in operative time, blood loss, and recovery compared to LAVH.
One RCT showed improved patient satisfaction with LSH versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection.

Conclusions:

The definitive value and indications for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy remain unclear due to insufficient high-quality evidence.
Well-designed randomized controlled trials are necessary to compare LSH against LAVH, total vaginal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy.
Future research should assess short- and long-term morbidity, including vaginal bleeding, cervical disease, sexual function, urinary symptoms, and pelvic prolapse.