Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion-induced illusory displacement reexamined: differences between perception and action?

Dirk Kerzel1, Karl R Gegenfurtner

  • 1FB 06 Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft, Abteilung Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394 , Giessen, Germany. dirk.kerzel@psychol.uni-giessen.de

Experimental Brain Research
|December 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The visual illusion of a drifting grating

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal acceleration drives the probability cueing effect in visual search: Evidence for early attentional deployment (N1pc) at high-probability locations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Human-aligned evaluation of a pixel-wise DNN color constancy model.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Swiping colors in virtual reality: How stable are color category borders?

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Keeping your eye, head, and hand on the ball: Rapidly orchestrated visuomotor behavior in a continuous action task.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

Chromatic and achromatic contrast sensitivity in the far periphery.

Journal of vision·2025

Area of Science:

  • * Visual perception and psychophysics.
  • * Investigating motion perception and spatial mislocalization.
  • * Understanding the impact of different judgment methods on visual illusions.

Background:

  • * A visual illusion causes a drifting sine-wave grating to be misperceived in its direction of motion.
  • * Prior studies suggested this illusion was larger for central pointing than for linear judgments.
  • * The current study re-examines these findings by employing varied comparison methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To investigate how different perceptual and motor judgment methods affect the magnitude of a motion-induced visual illusion.
  • * To determine if the comparison between perceptual and motor measures is dependent on the specific task.
  • * To analyze the direction of target mislocalization relative to foveal and non-foveal reference points.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • * Participants judged the position of a Gabor patch using various comparison stimuli: moving patches, stationary lines, and flashed lines.
  • * Both probe (perceptual) and motor (pointing) judgments were collected.
  • * The magnitude of the spatial misperception illusion was quantified for each condition.

Main Results:

  • * The illusion magnitude varied significantly based on the comparison method used.
  • * With moving patches, the illusion was larger for probe judgments than motor judgments.
  • * With stationary lines, the illusion magnitude was similar for both judgment types; with flashed lines, it was smaller for probe judgments.

Conclusions:

  • * The discrepancy between perceptual and motor measures of the visual illusion is highly dependent on the experimental methodology.
  • * Motor judgments showed target mislocalization towards the fovea.
  • * Probe judgments indicated target displacement away from the fovea relative to line probes.