Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stem cells: public policy and ethics.

Cindy R Towns1, D Gareth Jones

  • 1Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, University of Otago, New Zealand.

New Zealand Bioethics Journal
|December 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IFAA Recommendations for good practice for the donation and anatomical study of human remains (revised 2026).

Anatomical sciences education·2026
Same author

Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom.

Journal of religion and health·2022
Same author

Mixed gender accommodation: prevalence, trend over time and vulnerability of older adults.

Internal medicine journal·2022
Same author

From undergraduate to postgraduate uses of the dead human body: consequential ethical shift.

Journal of medical ethics·2020
Same author

Opioid Utilization and Perception of Pain Control in Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study of 11 Sites in 8 Countries.

Journal of hospital medicine·2019
Same author

Confucianism and organ donation: moral duties from xiao (filial piety) to ren (humaneness).

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2019
Same journal

Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: law commentary.

New Zealand bioethics journal·2005
Same journal

In that case: two-year-old Sarah is admitted to the paediatric ward with acute Myeloblastic leukaemia. Commentary.

New Zealand bioethics journal·2005
Same journal

In that case: two-year-old Sarah is admitted to the paediatric ward with acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Commentary.

New Zealand bioethics journal·2005
Same journal

In that case: Mrs A and her husband, Mr A, consulted different GPs at the same medical centre. Response.

New Zealand bioethics journal·2005
Same journal

In that case: Mrs A and her husband, Mr A, consulted different GPs at the same medical centre. Response.

New Zealand bioethics journal·2005
Same journal

In that case: Karen is a 31-year-old woman who suffers from schizophrenia and has been treated with an anti-psychotic medication for a number years. Commentary.

New Zealand bioethics journal·2005
See all related articles

Regulations for human stem cell research require scientific and ethical alignment. Current policies, like Position B, permit existing embryonic stem cells but still involve embryo destruction, suggesting Position C as a more consistent ethical alternative.

Area of Science:

  • Human stem cell biology
  • Bioethics
  • Science policy

Background:

  • Stem cell research involves complex scientific, ethical, and policy considerations.
  • Understanding stem cell plasticity and potential (pluripotential vs. totipotential) is crucial for informed debate.
  • Current regulations on human stem cell research vary globally.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing regulatory positions on human stem cell research.
  • To critique the widely adopted "compromise" Position B.
  • To propose alternative ethical and policy frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of scientific literature on stem cell plasticity.
  • Review of international regulations governing human stem cell research.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical critique of different regulatory positions (A, B, C, D).

    • Main Results:

    • Four distinct regulatory positions on human embryo research exist.
    • Position B, adopted by the US, Germany, and Australia, restricts use to existing embryonic stem cells.
    • Position B is critiqued for its failure to prevent ongoing human embryo destruction due to in vitro fertilization (IVF) practices.

    Conclusions:

    • Position B represents an inconsistent ethical stance regarding human embryo research.
    • Position C, allowing use of surplus IVF embryos, offers a more ethically coherent alternative.
    • The debate may evolve towards considering Position D, involving embryo creation for research.