Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Acupoint Application Combined with Acupressure as an Adjunctive Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Published on: June 21, 2024
Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity--an update
Steven M Grunberg1, David Osoba, Paul J Hesketh
1University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA. Steven.Grunberg@uvm.edu
Abstract:
Development of effective antiemetic therapy depends upon an understanding of both the antiemetic agents and the emetogenic challenges these agents are designed to address. New potential antiemetic agents should be studied in an orderly manner, proceeding from phase I to phase II open-label trials and then to randomized double-blind phase III trials comparing new agents and regimens to best standard therapy. Use of placebos in place of antiemetic therapy against highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy is unacceptable. Nausea and vomiting should be evaluated separately and for both the acute and delayed periods. Defining the emetogenicity of new antineoplastic agents is a challenge, since such data are often not reliably recorded during early drug development. A four-level classification system is proposed for emetogenicity of intravenous antineoplastic agents. A separate four-level classification system for emetogenicity of oral antineoplastic agents, which are often given over an extended period of time, is also proposed.
Insights
Effective antiemetic therapies require understanding agents and challenges. New antiemetic drugs need rigorous study, avoiding placebos for high-risk chemotherapy, and classifying agent emetogenicity is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Effective antiemetic therapy is crucial for patient tolerance of chemotherapy.
- Understanding both antiemetic drugs and chemotherapy's emetogenic potential is key.
- Current methods for classifying chemotherapy emetogenicity need refinement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline a structured approach for developing and evaluating new antiemetic agents.
- To emphasize the importance of rigorous clinical trial phases for antiemetics.
- To propose a classification system for the emetogenicity of antineoplastic agents.
Main Methods:
- Phase I, II, and III clinical trials for new antiemetic agents.
- Randomized double-blind trials comparing new agents to standard therapy.
- Development of a four-level classification system for intravenous and oral antineoplastic agent emetogenicity.
Main Results:
- Placebo use is deemed unacceptable in trials against highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
- Separate evaluation of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting is recommended.
- Proposed classification systems for both intravenous and oral antineoplastic agent emetogenicity.
Conclusions:
- A systematic approach to antiemetic drug development and evaluation is necessary.
- Standardized classification of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity will aid in therapy selection.
- Rigorous trial design and appropriate patient monitoring are essential for advancing antiemetic care.
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Anthelminthic Agents
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
