Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

SAR modelling of complex phenomena: probing methodological limitations.

Herbert S Rosenkranz1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, P.O. Box 3091, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals : ATLA
|December 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Structure-activity relationship (SAR) models show promise for toxicity prediction. However, current data limitations may restrict their ability to model complex toxicological phenomena like systemic toxicity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The challenge of testing chemicals for potential carcinogenicity using multiple short-term assays: an analysis of a proposed test battery for hair dyes.

Mutation research·2007
Same author

Lack of predictivity of the rat lethality (LD50) test for ecological and human health effects.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2005
Same author

SAR modeling of genotoxic phenomena: the consequence on predictive performance of deviation from a unity ratio of genotoxicants/non-genotoxicants.

Mutation research·2004
Same author

Synergy between systemic toxicity and genotoxicity: relevance to human cancer risk.

Mutation research·2003
Same author

Environmental odors and health hazards.

The Science of the total environment·2003
Same author

SAR: flavonoids and COX-2 inhibition.

Oncology research·2003

Area of Science:

  • Computational toxicology
  • Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) modeling
  • Predictive toxicology

Background:

  • Structure-activity relationship (SAR) approaches are increasingly utilized for toxicity modeling.
  • Evaluating the limitations of SAR methodologies is crucial for their reliable application.
  • The MULTICASE SAR program's capacity for complex toxicological phenomena requires assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the limits of the MULTICASE SAR program in modeling complex biological and toxicological phenomena.
  • To determine the data requirements for handling complex phenomena with SAR models.
  • To identify potential limitations in current SAR model datasets for specific toxicity endpoints.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of the MULTICASE SAR program's performance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data set size and composition (minimum 300 chemicals, equally divided active/inactive).
  • Comparison of modeled phenomena complexity with existing applications.

    • Main Results:

    • The MULTICASE SAR program can handle complex phenomena (e.g., allergic contact dermatitis, Salmonella mutagenicity, biodegradability, tubulin polymerization inhibition) with adequate data.
    • Sufficient data (≥300 chemicals, balanced active/inactive) enables modeling of phenomena more complex than previously achieved.
    • Current datasets used for SAR model generation may limit the modeling of certain complex toxicities, such as systemic toxicity (e.g., LD50).

    Conclusions:

    • SAR modeling, particularly with programs like MULTICASE, shows significant potential for predicting various toxicological endpoints.
    • The capacity of SAR models is strongly dependent on the quality and quantity of the training data.
    • Limitations exist in current SAR datasets, potentially hindering the accurate prediction of complex systemic toxicities.