Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
Dominant effects of CCR2-CCR5 haplotypes in HIV-1 disease progression
Cheryl A Winkler1, Houria Hendel, Mary Carrington
1Laboratory of Genomic Diversity, Division of Basic Research, SAIC-Frederick, NCI, Frederick, MD, USA.
Insights
Genetic variations in CCR2 and CCR5 influence HIV-1 progression, with protective and susceptible effects observed early in infection. These genetic factors appear to have minimal impact on long-term non-progression in AIDS patients.
Area of Science:
- Immunogenetics
- Virology
- Human Genetics
Background:
- Haplotypes in the CCR2-CCR5 region are known to influence the progression of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
- The temporal effect of these genetic variations on Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection progression remains unclear, with potential early or late stage impacts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific contributions of CCR2 64I, CCR5 Delta32, and CCR5 promoter haplotype +.P1.+ to AIDS progression.
- To determine whether the effects of these genetic factors are constant throughout infection or are specific to early or late stages of HIV-1 infection.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the GRIV cohort, comparing rapid progressors (RP) and slow progressors (SP) with a seroconverter control group.
- Genotyping for CCR2 64I, CCR5 Delta32, and CCR5 promoter haplotype +.P1.+ in patient groups representing disease progression extremes.
- Statistical analysis using odds ratios and p-values to assess the significance of genetic associations with AIDS progression.
Main Results:
- CCR5 Delta32 demonstrated a significant early protective effect (OR=0.25, P=0.007) against AIDS progression.
- CCR5 +.P1.+ showed a significant early susceptible effect (OR=2.1, P=0.01) on AIDS progression.
- The influence of these genetic factors was more pronounced in early disease progression, with diminishing significance in later stages or long-term non-progressors.
Conclusions:
- The genetic variants CCR2 64I, CCR5 Delta32, and CCR5 +.P1.+ exert their primary influence on the early stages of HIV-1 infection and AIDS progression.
- These genetic polymorphisms have a limited role in maintaining non-progression beyond 8 years of HIV-1 infection.
- Long-term non-progression is likely mediated by factors other than the studied CCR2 and CCR5 genetic variants.
Abstract:
Three haplotypes for the CCR2-CCR5 region previously have been shown to affect AIDS progression; however, it is not known if the protective and accelerating effects of the haplotypes are relatively constant throughout infection or exert their effects early or late in HIV type 1 infection. The authors report the relative contributions to AIDS progression of CCR2 64I, CCR5 Delta32, and the CCR5 promoter haplotype +.P1.+ in the GRIV cohort, which included patients representing the extremes of the distribution for AIDS progression: rapid progressors (RP) who developed CD4 T-cell counts of <300/ mm within 3 years after the last HIV-1-seronegative test and slow progressors (SP) who were HIV-1 infected for > or =8 years with CD4 T-cell counts of >500/mm. Comparing the RP with a seroconverter control group including intermediate progressors to AIDS, we observed the early protective effect of CCR5 Delta32 (odds ratio = 0.25; P = 0.007) was similar in strength to the early susceptible effect of CCR5 +.P1.+ (odds ratio = 2.1, P = 0.01). Comparison of the intermediate control group to the SP showed weaker and less significant odd ratios, suggesting that the effect of these factors tended to be stronger on early progression; the tendency towards a disproportionately early effect was significant for CCR5 Delta32 (P = 0.04) but not for CCR5 +.P1.+ (P = 0.12). Follow-up of SP demonstrated that these polymorphisms have little effect after 8 years, because the subset of SP who had progression after study entry had the same genotype distribution as the global population of SP, suggesting that factors other than CCR5 or CCR2 genetic variants must be responsible for the long-term maintenance of nonprogression.
More Related Videos
07:06Prediction of HIV-1 Coreceptor Usage (Tropism) by Sequence Analysis using a Genotypic Approach
Published on: December 1, 2011
07:26High-resolution Melting PCR for Complement Receptor 1 Length Polymorphism Genotyping: An Innovative Tool for Alzheimer's Disease Gene Susceptibility Assessment
Published on: July 18, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Genetic Lingo
Multiple Allele Traits